MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3087611399 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100546

COVID-19 in COPD: A growing concern

2020· article· en· W3087611399 sur OpenAlexaff
Don D. Sin

Notice bibliographique

RevueEClinicalMedicine · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Établissements canadiensSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesBoehringer IngelheimAstraZeneca
Mots-clésMedicineCOPDCase fatality rateCoronavirusEpidemiologyPandemicDiseaseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Intensive care medicineInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As of August 24, 2020, over 23 million people around the world have been infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic [[1]Coronavirus Worldometer. available at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.Google Scholar]. The case-fatality rate is between 0.5% and 1% with most dying from respiratory failure related to diffuse alveolar damage, vascular thrombosis or pulmonary edema [[2]Ackermann M. Verleden S.E. Kuehnel M. et al.Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in Covid-19.N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 120-128Crossref PubMed Scopus (3552) Google Scholar]. To date, 813,000 individuals worldwide have succumbed to the disease[[1]Coronavirus Worldometer. available at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.Google Scholar]. There is considerable debate on whether (or not) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a common airway disease that affects ~10% of individuals over 45 years of age [[3]Singh D. Agusti A. Anzueto A. et al.Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019.Eur Respir J. 2019; 53Crossref Scopus (1025) Google Scholar], is a risk factor for COVID-19. A recent review of the epidemiological literature revealed wide-ranging prevalence (1.1–38%) of COPD among patients with COVID-194. However, these previous studies may have suffered from several important methodological limitations including small sample sizes and ascertainment bias. The study by Attaway et al. addresses some of these limitations and provides important data that fill in critical gaps in knowledge [[5]Attaway A.A. Zein J. Hatipoğlu U.S SARS-CoV-2 infection in the COPD population is associated with increased healthcare utilization: an analysis of Cleveland Clinic’s COVID-19 Registry.EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 26100515Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (39) Google Scholar]. Using a large and robust Cleveland Clinic COVID-19 registry, the investigators abstracted data on patient characteristics including co-morbidities on all laboratory confirmed cases of COVID-19 at their center. Of the 15,586 symptomatic patients, who were tested for COVID-19, 1319 (9.2%) had COPD. Interestingly, after adjustment for covariates, the investigators found no significant differences in the rate of SARS-CoV-2 positivity between COPD and non-COPD patients. However, significantly higher rates of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio of 1.36), ICU admissions (adjusted odds ratio of 1.20) and invasive mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio of 1.49) were observed in COPD patients infected with the virus (versus non-COPD patients). These data are remarkably consistent with those by Guan et al., who in 1590 laboratory confirmed hospitalised patients from 575 hospitals in China showed that COPD patients were 2.6 times more likely to experience ICU admissions, invasive mechanical ventilation or death [[6]Guan W.J. Liang W.H. Zhao Y. et al.Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis.Eur Respir J. 2020; 55Crossref Scopus (8) Google Scholar]. Together, these data suggest that COPD is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 that leads to hospitalization and ICU admission. How does COPD increase the risk of severe COVID-19? Although the exact mechanisms have not been fully worked out, there are several intriguing possibilities. The first point of host engagement for SARS-CoV-2 is usually the nasal mucosa, which contains an abundance of a protein called angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2)[[4]Leung J.M. Niikura M. Yang C.W.T. Sin D.D COVID-19 and COPD.Eur Respir J. 2020; 562002108Crossref Scopus (176) Google Scholar]. The virus uses this protein as its receptor to gain entry into epithelial cells. Once in, the virus usurps the cellular machinery of the host to produce a myriad of daughter virions, which are ultimately released into the extracellular milieu, causing infection of adjacent cells and propagation of the virus into more distal parts of the respiratory tract. Without ACE-2, infection is aborted and ACE-2 expression levels in lungs are associated with increased severity of COVID-192. It is now well established that patients with COPD have increased expression of ACE-2 in the lower respiratory tract, which is further amplified by active smoking [[7]Milne S. Yang C.X. Timens W. Bosse Y. Sin D.D SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 gene expression and RAAS inhibitors.Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8: e50-ee1Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar,[8]Leung J.M. Yang C.X. Tam A. et al.ACE-2 expression in the small airway epithelia of smokers and COPD patients: implications for COVID-19.Eur. Respir. J. 2020; 55Crossref Scopus (555) Google Scholar]. This may increase the risk for severe COVID-19. Another possibility is that patients with COPD often demonstrate perturbations in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with up-regulation of ACE and angiotensin II [[9]Ü Toru C Ayada Genç O. Sahin S. Ö Arik Bulut I Serum levels of RAAS components in COPD.Eur Respir J. 2015; 46 (suppl 59): PA3970Google Scholar] that may be exacerbated during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, leading to acute pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary edema. Another consideration is pharmacotherapy. COPD patients are often prescribed inhaled medications such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Provocatively, in the paper by Attaway et al., they showed that those patients who tested positively for SARS-CoV-2 were 2.4 times less likely to have used corticosteroids at the time of testing than those who tested negatively (18.3% vs 44.8%, p < 0.001) [[5]Attaway A.A. Zein J. Hatipoğlu U.S SARS-CoV-2 infection in the COPD population is associated with increased healthcare utilization: an analysis of Cleveland Clinic’s COVID-19 Registry.EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 26100515Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (39) Google Scholar]. Although these data cannot be considered definitive owing to important methodological limitations such as confounding by indication and severity, they raise the possibility that corticosteroids may offer some protection against COVID-19. Thus, during this pandemic, patients with COPD should be encouraged to use their prescribed inhalers as they did prior to the pandemic. Long-acting bronchodilators are first line therapies for COPD, followed by the addition of ICS for those who are frequent exacerbators and during significant exacerbations, they should be managed with antibiotics and oral corticosteroids [[3]Singh D. Agusti A. Anzueto A. et al.Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019.Eur Respir J. 2019; 53Crossref Scopus (1025) Google Scholar]. For exacerbations directly related to SARS-CoV-2 infection, they should be treated with systemic dexamethasone, especially if they require supplemental oxygenation or invasive mechanical ventilation. Under these settings, the use of dexamethasone has been shown to reduce mortality by 18% to 36% [[10]Group R.C. Horby P. Lim W.S. et al.Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19 – preliminary report.N Engl J Med. 2020; Google Scholar]. As illustrated by Attaway et al. [[5]Attaway A.A. Zein J. Hatipoğlu U.S SARS-CoV-2 infection in the COPD population is associated with increased healthcare utilization: an analysis of Cleveland Clinic’s COVID-19 Registry.EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 26100515Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (39) Google Scholar], COVID-19 is a growing concern in patients with COPD. However, with proper mitigation efforts and appropriate inhaler therapy, COPD patients may be “protected” from the severe consequences of SARS-CoV-2 during this pandemic. DDS has received research funding from AstraZeneca (AZ) and Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) and for speaking engagements from AZ, BI, and Grifols. SARS-CoV-2 infection in the COPD population is associated with increased healthcare utilization: An analysis of Cleveland clinic's COVID-19 registryOur analysis demonstrated that COPD patients with COVID-19 had a higher risk for healthcare utilization, although adjusted in-hospital mortality risk was not different than the non-COPD patients with COVID-19. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,362
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,740
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,362
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,236
Tête enseignante GPT0,525
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations28
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEClinicalMedicineMême sujetCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesTravaux en français237 207