Phenological Mismatch is Correlated with Fitness Outcomes and Adaptive Behavior in a Generalist Avian Predator Distributed Across North America
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Climate-driven advances in the start of spring may result in a phenological mismatch between peak-prey abundance and the breeding season of secondary consumers. Phenological mismatch has been well-studied in insectivorous birds for which reproductive productivity is strongly linked to caterpillar abundance. The effects of mismatch on the productivity of dietary generalists, that forage on several types of prey, are less well-understood. Further, few studies have addressed questions about the effects of mismatch on survival, an important component of fitness that can be affected by breeding in sub-optimal conditions. We examined the relationship between phenological mismatch and fitness for a widespread generalist raptor, the American kestrel (Falco sparverius). In the first chapter, we collected productivity data from nest observations across the contiguous US and southern Canada and quantified phenological mismatch on each nest as the difference in days between the start of spring and clutch initiation. Then, we examined the relationship between mismatch, location, and productivity. Also, we investigated whether incubation behavior leading to hatching-asynchrony was related to phenological mismatch. Kestrels that laid eggs after the start of spring had fewer nestlings and higher rates of nest failure compared to kestrels that laid eggs before the start of spring. The strength of the mismatch effect depended on location. In the northeast, the number of fledglings per brood and rates of nest success were high for pairs nesting before the start of spring, but the effect of phenological mismatch was strongest here, with rapid declines in nest success associated with mismatch. Whereas, in the xi southwest, early-laying pairs had lower productivity and success relative to the northeast, but the effects of phenological mismatch were not as strong as the northeast. The effect of location is likely related to climatic constraints on the growing season and the time window for kestrel breeding that are becoming stronger in the northeast and weaker in the southwest. The timing of male incubation behavior was associated with hatching asynchrony, and males breeding after the start of spring were more likely to initiate incubation early as opposed to males breeding before the spring index date, suggesting that hatching asynchrony is a possible mechanism to cope with phenological mismatch. In the second chapter, we investigated the relationships between phenological mismatch and survival using mark-and-recapture data from two distinct, long-term study sites in Idaho and New Jersey where kestrel exhibit difference migration strategies. We created a multistate mark-recapture models to estimate the annual survival of adult (afterhatch- year) and juvenile (hatch-year or yearling) kestrels. For the multistate framework, we categorized the phenological mismatch of nests at each site “earlier” or “later” relative to the yearly median difference in days between clutch initiation date and the start-of-spring date, which was estimated at each nest box location. In addition, we included covariates for nesting success, sex, and minimum winter temperature anomaly in our survival models. Mismatch was associated with the survival of kestrels that produced young; however, the direction of this effect differed between populations. In Idaho, successful kestrels had higher survival when they bred “earlier” rather than “later.” In New Jersey, successful kestrels had higher survival when they bred “later” rather than “earlier." Differences in survival between sites may reflect differences in seasonality, climate change patterns, or consequences of migration strategies. For partially migrant xii populations (i.e, Idaho kestrels), mismatch may rapidly drive directional selection for birds to breed earlier by favoring survival and productivity, but for fully migrant populations (i.e., New Jersey) that have a limited window of time to reproduce, mismatch may create trade-offs between reproduction and survival. Mismatch did not affect the survival of adult birds with failed nests, and there was no difference in survival between hatch-year birds produced from “earlier” or “later” nests. In Idaho, males had higher survival rates than females and warmer winter temperatures positively correlated with survival in all age and sex classes. In New Jersey, sex and winter temperature did not explain survival. In sum, we found negative consequences of phenological mismatch on the fitness of American kestrels, generalist predator. For both productivity and survival, the effect of mismatch was more severe for kestrels in the northeast, where the breeding season is shorter and kestrels more migratory when compared to the west. These results demonstrate that duration of breeding season is an important factor to consider when assessing vulnerability to climate change, and that a generalist diet does not ensure resilience to phenological mismatch.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».