MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3089180151

Solar Thermal Geothermal Hybrid System With a Bottoming Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle

2019· article· en· W3089180151 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Francesca Moloney

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaNational Science Foundation
Mots-clésOrganic Rankine cycleDegree RankineSupercritical fluidRankine cycleEnvironmental scienceWaste managementProcess engineeringPetroleum engineeringThermodynamicsEngineeringWaste heatHeat exchangerPhysicsPower (physics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Climate change has spurred an interest in renewable energy. Many renewable energy technologies are intermittent, such as solar energy, or are dependent on transient conditions such as the ambient temperature in the case of geothermal energy. While solar thermal energy is able to achieve high temperatures and efficiencies, geothermal energy is limited by its lower temperatures which results in low conversion efficiency. There is an opportunity to create a hybrid system using both solar thermal and geothermal energy to improve their stand-alone performance.\nIn the literature, solar-geothermal hybrid systems are limited by the temperature of the solar field and the cycles and fluids used. In this study, a hybrid solar thermal-geothermal system is studied with a combined cycle operating from two temperature sources: the high temperature source is provided by solar power tower (SPT) and geothermal provides the lower temperature. The innovation lies in the implementation of the geothermal source into the combined cycle and the inclusion of a recuperative supercritical organic Rankine cycle (ORC) as the bottoming cycle to further enhance the system and also capable of operating with the geothermal source only. First, an ORC is optimized for geothermal reservoirs with temperatures between 170 and 240°C. It was found that the optimized parameters result in wet fluids achieving lower expansion ratios. Only two fluids were optimized with a subcritical configuration due to proximity to the critical point.\nNext, the combined cycle was developed and optimized. This analysis was performed assuming only one heat source, such as solar energy, being introduced to the topping cycle. Based on the literature review, a recuperative supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle was chosen as the topping cycle. The pressures of both cycles were optimized as well as the approach temperature difference between the two cycles. The same fluids considered in the first analysis were considered in the bottoming recuperative ORC cycle except ethane and carbon dioxide which performed the worst. The optimized conditions were used for the hybrid analysis.\nThree hybrid configurations were analyzed where the geothermal source was introduced to the combined cycle in various locations. In the literature, the most common solar-geothermal hybrid system analyzed was where the solar energy through parabolic troughs was used to add additional heat to either the geothermal source or directly to the working fluid to increase the cycle temperature and efficiency. In one hybrid configuration, the geothermal source was used to superheat the organic Rankine cycle. The two other configurations used geothermal energy to preheat the carbon dioxide after recompression or to reheat it after recuperation and before being introduced to the ORC. The incremental effectiveness due to geothermal heat, i.e., the additional work that is converted from the additional heat added from the geothermal source, was analyzed.\nFinally, the best performing hybrid system for a maximum cycle temperature of 500°C was selected and analyzed transiently with thermal storage. The superheat hybrid configuration with acetone as the working fluid with a recompression topping cycle was chosen. When solar energy and thermal storage was not available, the ORC was run with geothermal energy. As the acetone has a critical temperature above the temperature considered for the geothermal source, it resulted in a subcritical ORC. Subsequently, the power ratio between the sCO2 cycle and ORC was very low. For this configuration, thermal storage was very beneficial to extend the time of high-power production.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,565
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,154
Écart entre enseignants0,148 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDigital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)Même sujetGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207