MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3090176384 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.09.030

Commentary: Preaching to the wire

2020· editorial· en· W3090176384 sur OpenAlexaff
Hellmuth R. Muller Moran, Michael H. Yamashita

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Techniques · 2020
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueVascular Anomalies and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPulmonary thromboendarterectomyMedicineSpecialtyPercutaneousScopusChronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertensionPulmonary arteryEndarterectomyEmbolizationCardiologySurgeryMEDLINEPathologyLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageIn order to remain at the forefront of our specialty, cardiac surgeons and trainees must maintain at least a working knowledge—and ideally a basic skillset—in available wire-based techniques.See Article page 147. In order to remain at the forefront of our specialty, cardiac surgeons and trainees must maintain at least a working knowledge—and ideally a basic skillset—in available wire-based techniques. See Article page 147. Mangukia and colleagues1Mangukia C. Forfia P. Vaidya A. Williams V. Niman D. Rali P. et al.Percutaneous coil embolization to manage pulmonary artery hemorrhage after distal endarterectomy.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 4: 147-149Google Scholar present an interesting case of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy complicated by arterial injury resulting in massive hemoptysis. Although the complication itself is not terribly novel—hemorrhage and hemoptysis are well-established risks of pulmonary thromboendarteretomy2Ansari A. Cobert J. Navuluri N. Cheng G. Haney J.C. Welsby I. Intrapulmonary activated factor VII for hemoptysis complicating pulmonary thromboendarterectomy.Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 109: e243-e245Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar,3Rahnavardi M. Yan T.D. Cao C. Vallely M.P. Bannon P.G. Wilson M.K. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review.Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 17: 435-445Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar and the authors themselves admit that this is not the first occurrence at their institution—the method of treatment should be insightful for surgeons and trainees wishing to remain at the forefront of our specialty. Cardiac surgery has generally been a specialty characterized by open surgical procedures. However, just as the advent of percutaneous coronary intervention revolutionized the treatment of ischemic heart disease, transcatheter procedures continue to change the care of other cardiovascular diseases that have traditionally been the domain of open surgery. Interventions for the aorta and aortic valve are already commonplace and, as this case demonstrates, transcatheter procedures can often improve on the perioperative risks of traditional open surgery. Although surgical intervention in the form of lobectomy was considered here, it was ultimately deemed a suboptimal option. To offer the best care to their patients, it is imperative that cardiac surgeons develop at least a working knowledge of available wire-based techniques. The current climate of increased specialization may not realistically allow all cardiac surgeons to be as well-versed or proficient in these techniques as an interventional radiologist, vascular surgeon, or interventional cardiologist may be. It therefore behooves the cardiac surgeon to maintain open lines of communication with these complimentary specialties and to ideally establish a basic, fundamental skillset that can serve as a springboard for more advanced procedures. It is clear that wire skills are an integral part of contemporary cardiac surgical practice and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. Indeed, most cardiac surgeons are already well aware of this fact, with many leaders in our field calling for greater emphasis to be placed on transcatheter skills during training.4Nguyen T.C. Tang G.H.L. Nguyen S. Forcillo J. George I. Kaneko T. et al.The train has left: can surgeons still get a ticket to treat structural heart disease?.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 157: 2369-2376.e2Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar,5Pelletier M.P. Kaneko T. Peterson M.D. Thourani V.H. From sutures to wires: the evolving necessities of cardiac surgery training.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 154: 990-993Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar Emphasizing the importance of wire skills to cardiac surgeons is therefore very much like preaching to the choir. While the degree of surgical involvement in advanced procedures such as the described pulmonary artery coil embolization may vary by center and by surgeon, there are ample opportunities within our everyday activities to begin developing these skills. Trainees and acolytes take note; the wire is here to stay. Percutaneous coil embolization to manage pulmonary artery hemorrhage after distal endarterectomyJTCVS TechniquesVol. 4PreviewA 68-year-old male patient with a medical history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea was referred to our pulmonary hypertension (PH) program for chronic thromboembolic PH evaluation. Echocardiography revealed abnormal septal motion consistent with elevated right ventricular (RV) afterload, bi-atrial dilation, RV dilation with normal RV function, moderate PH, and severe tricuspid regurgitation. Planar and single-photon emission computer tomography ventilation–perfusion scan showed perfusion defects predominantly in the right upper lobe and left lower lobe (LLL). Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,148
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,809

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,286 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJTCVS TechniquesMême sujetVascular Anomalies and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207