Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to explore the pedagogical method and approach of clarinetist Avrahm Galper (1921-2004), the former principal clarinetist of the Toronto Symphony Orchestra and author of clarinet method and study books. Galper was an esteemed pedagogue with numerous students who are members of professional orchestras, faculty members at distinguished institutions across Canada and the United States of America, and innovators in the music field. This study strives to answer this question: How has Avrahm Galper influenced and contributed to the field of clarinet pedagogy as a teacher? An examination of his teaching provides insight on the impact private instructors can have on students as individuals and on his impact on the clarinet community. This is a case study of the individual practice of a significant figure in the development of music education in Canada. The study includes an overview of Avrahm Galper’s pedagogical methods based on his own published materials in conjunction with the interviews with his students. A literature review of standard clarinet repertoire and pedagogical materials provides the foundation to this study. Through the transcription and analysis of semi-structured interviews, the documentation reveals the unique personal relationship between teacher and student. Nine former students were interviewed for this study. Interviewees represented students who studied with Galper over the span of four decades from the 1960s to the 2000s, thus providing an overview of Avrahm Galper’s teaching career. At the core of Avrahm Galper’s teaching philosophy was the need to develop and maintain a strong foundation stemming from the mastery of the low register of the clarinet. Significant attributes of Avrahm Galper’s teaching include his concern for the development of the whole person in his students, his adherence to core principles of pedagogy with flexibility within structure to best respond to the needs of the students, and the fact that Galper was constantly learning, evolving as a teacher, and adapting his approach to teaching. Galper’s students have been deeply influenced by their time with him and have adapted aspects of Galper’s teaching in their own teaching.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».