Notice bibliographique
Résumé
On March 21, 2014, Seyed Amir Akrami, a visiting Iranian scholar at the EasternMennonite University in Harrisonburg, VA, visited the headquarters ofthe International Institute of Islamic Thought. He holds a PhD in the philosophyof religion (McGill University), as well as a BA and an MA in Islamictheology and mysticism (University of Tehran).In his opening remarks he stated that with the end of the Cold War, thecloser relations between politics and religion necessitates interfaith relations.Realizing this, the West (especially the United States) has undertaken an unprecedentedstep: establishing centers for religion and diplomacy. Akrami considersthis a very positive development. Another reason for this new approachwas Samuel Huntington’s (d. 2008) “clash of civilizations” theory, which upsetmany Muslims. What is often forgotten, however, is that Huntington alsocalled for dialogue. President Mohammad Khatami of Iran responded to thisby launching his 2001 “dialogue of civilizations” initiative. Akrami maintainsthat political and economic polarization is being replaced by cultures, of whichreligion is a very important part. Given that Islam and Christianity are theworld’s two largest religions, it is more practical to focus on them than tryingto start a dialogue with all religions at this time.The second part of his presentation consisted of several historical observationsrelated to Christian views of Islam, Muslim views of other religions(especially Christianity), and how best to approach/view these two religions’relationship. John of Damascus (d. 750), an early Christian scholar of Islamnoted for his largely polemical works, viewed Islam as a Christian heresy.Centuries later, the Crusades poisoned Muslim-Christian relations. But, importantly,part of the reason for this military onslaught was the great schismof 1054 that split Christendom between the Catholic Church (Rome) and theOrthodox Church (Constantinople).Normal Daniel’s Islam and the West: The Making of an Image (Oxford:Oneworld, 1993) is a very good source for these negative views. Among themare the following: (1) Muhammad was a cardinal who wanted to become thepope. When he failed in this attempt, he became a heretic; (2) Muhammadtrained a dove or a bird to sit on his shoulder in order to deceive/delude hisfollowers into thinking that he was being inspired; and (3) Dante, in his DivineComedy, called Muhammad an imposter and liar and therefore placed him inthe eighth circle of hell ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».