P303Maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) for CO2 stress in Rb-82 PET/CT respiratory gated imaging
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Funding Acknowledgements: NSERC ENGAGE grant EGP-463679-14 and Ontario Research Fund grant ORF-RE07-021 Introduction: Cardiac stress testing with positron emission tomography (PET) is a recognized modality for detection and evaluation of the severity of coronary artery disease. Typically, this involves the use of pharmacological agents (dipyridamole/adenosine) which can have side effects and be adversely affected by other drugs such as caffeine. A potential alternative is inhaled carbon dioxide (CO2) which acts as a coronary vasodilator. However, CO2 stress increases the tidal volume and respiratory rate of patients leading to reconstruction artifacts. A potential solution is maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA), which creates a separate phase-matched transmission image (MLAA-TR) for every respiratory gate. But the original MLAA can only reconstruct images up to an unknown scaling factor, preventing quantitative imaging. Purpose: Our three objectives were: to determine the number of iterations required for MLAA to converge with optimal MLAA-TR; to restore quantitative accuracy by compensating for the unknown scaling factor; and to validate improved attenuation correction using respiratory-gated patient data. Methods: 12 healthy volunteers were recruited. Images were acquired on a scanner. Most participants had an initial stress 82Rb (10 MBq/kg over 30 seconds) PET scan at 60 mmHg of end-tidal CO2 using sequential gas delivery for breath-by-breath control of arterial blood gases, followed by a repeat scan after 10 minutes (20 successful scans in total). Data were acquired for 6 minutes following 82Rb administration. A low dose CT was acquired at end-expiration for attenuation correction of stress scans, and used as an initial estimate for MLAA. Both time of flight (ToF) and MLAA reconstructions were performed. Static and ECG gated data were used to test the scaling correction. Cardiac/respiratory phases were split into 8 even time intervals (gates). A-priori values from the CT were used to correct scaling during reconstruction by fixing the mu-values in the MLAA-TR. Results: MLAA-TR attenuation values became stable at 6 iterations (24 subsets). Significant differences for ECG gated data (due to scaling) between ToF and MLAA reconstruction were corrected using MLAA-adjusted reconstruction. Artifacts typically present at end-inspiration with ToF reconstruction were either greatly reduced or eliminated using MLAA. The MLAA segmental variance was significantly lower for all acquisition types and motion frozen analysis (using the F-test two-sample variance with P < 0.05), showing increased homogeneity for MLAA reconstruction. Conclusion(s): MLAA-adjusted reconstruction can compensate for CTAC artifacts with phase matched transmission images derived from an initial low dose CT. Myocardial activity was more homogeneous in healthy normal subjects, and the quantitative accuracy was maintained by offset correction. Further research is required to validate the method in dynamic imaging. Abstract P303 Figure.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».