First Report of Leaf Spot Caused by <i>Colletotrichum fructicola</i> and <i>C. siamense</i> on <i>Ziziphus mauritiana</i> in Guangxi, China
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Zizyphus mauritiana Lam. is an important tropical fruit tree and has significant economic value. It is widely planted in Hainan, Guangdong, Guangxi and Fujian provinces in China (Yang et al. 2017). In March 2019, leaf spot was observed on leaves of Z. mauritiana at Bagui fields in Nanning, Guangxi, China, with incidence exceeding 50%. Symptomatic leaves developed a yellow to tan-brown sunken lesion and finally abscised. To isolate the pathogen causing the symptoms, small pieces (5 × 5 mm) of infected leaves were surface sterilized by exposure to 75% ethanol for 10 sec, 1% sodium hypochlorite for 1 min and rinsed three times in sterile water. Fifty pieces were isolated, surface sterilized, and pieces were plated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) and grown at 28°C for 7 days. The isolation rate of Colletotrichum species was 100%. Three representative isolates (DQZ3-1, DQZ3-2 and DQZ3-3) were selected for further study. Mycelia were greyish-white for all three isolates, with isolate DQZ3-1 also appearing dark green in the center of the colony. Conidia were elliptical, aseptate and hyaline, with sizes of 13.4 ± 0.12 µm × 5.7 ± 0.1 µm, 14.8 ± 0.1 µm × 5.8 ± 0.1 µm and 15.1 ± 0.1 µm × 5.5 ± 0.1 µm for DQZ3-1, DQZ3-2 and DQZ3-3, respectively. Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNAsecure Plant Kit [Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd] and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), partial actin (ACT), calmodulin (CAL), chitin synthase (CHS-1), beta-tubulin (TUB2), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) genes were sequenced (Weir et al. 2012). Phylogenetic analysis of the three isolates was performed with MEGA-X (Version 10.0) based on sequences of multiple loci (ITS, ACT, CAL, CHS-1, TUB2 and GAPDH) using Maximum Likelihood analysis. Isolate DQZ3-1 was identified as C. fructicola, and the other two isolates, DQZ3-2 and DQZ3-3, were identified as C. siamense (accessions MT039396 to MT039410, for ACT, CAL, CHS-1, GAPDH and TUB2 of DQZ3-1, DQZ3-2 and DQZ3-3; MT041651 to MT041653 for ITS of DQZ3-1, DQZ3-2 and DQZ3-3). Pathogenicity tests were conducted on 1-year-old plants. Young, healthy leaves were artificially wounded by gently scratching with a sterile needle and 10 µl droplets of conidial suspension (106 spores/ml) applied per wound site for each isolate. Some wounded leaves were inoculated with 10 µl droplets of water as controls. Each isolate was inoculated onto three plants, with 15 leaves at least for each plant, same as controls. All inoculated plants were sprayed with water and covered with plastic bags to maintain high humidity. Symptomatic lesions were observed on the inoculated leaves after 7 days at 28°C, whereas no symptoms were observed on the control leaves. To fulfill Koch's postulates, fungi were re-isolated from 50 symptomatic leaf pieces and fungi re-isolated from each leaf piece were morphologically identical to the inoculated isolates, for a 100% isolation frequency. To our knowledge, this is the first report of leaf spot caused by C. fructicola and C. siamense on Z. mauritiana worldwide. This research may accelerate the development of future epidemiological studies and management strategies for anthracnose caused by C. fructicola and C. siamense on Z. mauritiana.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».