The INSÉPArable portfolio tool to sustain continued education and the professional development of nurses for a full scope of nursing practice and enhanced patient safety competencies: An ethnographic study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread recognition of the undeniable impact of nurses on patient safety, important barriers relating to the organization of health systems still hinder the full expansion of the role of these professionals. In Quebec (Canada), nurses work overtime and increased adverse events are preoccupying and point to a possible lack of contemporary tools for continuous professional development. Innovative training tools should foster a more reflective practice focused on a holistic view of the patient in order to support the full scope of nursing practice and ensure continuous improvement in the quality of care. Such tools would make it possible to better understand their practice, according to their own perception, as well as its applicability in the emergence of a professional conscience which is essential to lasting safety competencies. This study's overarching goal was to propose a model and a portfolio prototype to support nurses' training. METHOD: Based on a humanistic and reflective perspective on patient care and safety competencies, a design approach was used to develop a portfolio prototype. Ethnography was used to collect and analyse data using shadowing observations of 10 nurse/patient dyads, followed by interviews about their care experience. The research was conducted in acute and long-term care settings of the Quebec City area. The iteration process resulted in a first version of the prototype that was then presented to various stakeholders during a co-design workshop aimed at better understanding the clinical applicability of this prototype. FINDINGS: The INSÉPArable project is illustrated in two interrelated figures, which reflects a complete inductive representation supporting sustainable patient safety from nursing practice experience. First, nursing practice status has been depicted as an iceberg metaphor where the essence of care, the « art of nursing » is hidden. Second, a sphere illustrates the direction to the full emergence of nursing practice that helps to enhance the hidden "art of nursing" by leading nurses towards optimal conditions conscience. DISCUSSION: INSÉPArable turned out to be more than an individual reflective tool as it also highlights the need for collective awareness among nurse managers regarding their responsibility in implementing and sustaining healthy work environments, in which optimal conditions are better supported. This also implies a renewed mode of governance and the implementation of more humanistic processes that redefine the contemporary professionalism of nurses, which are closely linked to patient safety.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».