MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3094545331 · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000005061

In Response

2020· letter· en· W3094545331 sur OpenAlexaffabout
C Bong, Christopher Brasher, Edson Chikumba, Robert McDougall, Jannicke Mellin‐Olsen, Angela Enright

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2020
Typeletter
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Établissements canadiensRoyal Jubilee HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the letter by Dr Subedi1 wherein he has raised some very important points about managing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic when working in a low-resource environment. It seems that Nepal has been very effective in coping with the pandemic thus far. Nevertheless, as in other countries, there are huge stresses placed on all health care workers (HCWs), both physically and mentally. As he says, governments need to recognize them for their commitment and loyalty to their patients. Certainly, the general populations in many countries have done so as evidenced by the singing (Italy), playing of musical instruments (Spain), and even banging of pots and pans (United States and Canada). But HCW, and others maintaining systems during the crisis, need more than that. He outlines some of the important things, such as proper sleep, food, and connections with loved ones. We could add others such as peer support and professional support when necessary. National and international anesthesia societies have also addressed this issue2,3 as have publications in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia.4 Another interesting point raised by Dr Subedi1 is that of the role of private hospitals versus public during the pandemic. Each country will have come to its own solution on this problem. He cites South Korea as being an example of excellent coordination between the 2 sectors. The Republic of Ireland chose a different route which certainly gained public support5 but was not without its challenges.6 In low-income countries, private hospitals may be much better equipped than public hospitals; in such cases, governments will need to negotiate with them as to how they may best serve their nation’s needs. Finally, there is the issue of inadequate supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE). This has been a problem almost everywhere but nowhere more so than in low-resource environments. Governments have rapidly reduced barriers to local production. Companies have been very creative but still the deficit exists. Much has been written about how to extend the life of PPE.7,8 Use of proper PPE is essential in protecting HCWs everywhere but especially in countries where they are a scarce commodity to be treasured and safeguarded. As noted in our article,9 the loss of HCWs after an epidemic can be substantial and can have long-lasting effects on the health care systems they serve. The pandemic of COVID-19 is challenging governments, health care systems, and HCWs as never before. We need to support each other as we find our way through this. It seems that the old advice of Semmelweis to wash our hands frequently and the new advice of public health to work together by staying apart will serve us all well. Choon-Looi Bong, MBChB, FRCADuke-National University of Singapore (NUS) Medical SchoolSingaporeYong Loo Lin School of MedicineSingaporeDepartment of Paediatric AnaesthesiaKK Women’s and Children’s HospitalSingapore Christopher Brasher, MBBS, FANZCAUniversity of MelbourneMelbourne, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain ManagementRoyal Children’s HospitalMelbourne, Victoria, Australia Edson Chikumba, MBChB, MMed (Anaesthesia)Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care MedicineCollege of Health SciencesUniversity of ZimbabweHarare, Zimbabwe Robert McDougall, MBBS, FANZCAUniversity of MelbourneMelbourne, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain ManagementRoyal Children’s HospitalMelbourne, Victoria, Australia Jannicke Mellin-Olsen, MD, DPHWorld Federation of Societies of AnaesthesiologistsLondon, United KingdomBaerum HospitalOslo, Norway Angela Enright, MBBCh BAO, FRCPCDepartment of AnesthesiaUniversity of British ColumbiaRoyal Jubilee HospitalVancouver, British Columbia, Canada[email protected]

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,478
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,745

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,021
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0060,003
Science ouverte0,0030,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0090,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4780,308

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,052
Tête enseignante GPT0,368
Écart entre enseignants0,316 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2020
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaMême sujetCOVID-19 and Mental HealthTravaux en français237 207