BAY 94-9027 Provides Safe and Effective Long-Term Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients: Results from the PROTECT VIII Kids Extension Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction BAY 94-9027 (damoctocog alfa pegol) is an extended-half-life PEGylated recombinant factor VIII approved for use in patients with hemophilia A aged ≥12 years (USPI; https://www.fda.gov/). Due to age-related pharmacokinetic and other differences to adult patients, there is a need to assess FVIII replacement products in pediatric populations (Shah et al, Haemophilia 2018, 24(5):733-40). In the PROTECT VIII Kids main study (NCT01775618), BAY 94-9027 was efficacious for the prevention and treatment of bleeds in previously treated patients (PTPs) aged <12 years with severe hemophilia A. We report long-term efficacy and safety data from the PROTECT VIII Kids extension in patients aged <6 and 6 to <12 years at study entry. Methods In PROTECT VIII Kids, male PTPs aged <12 years with severe hemophilia A were enrolled in two age cohorts: <6 and 6 to <12 years. Patients received BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis twice weekly (25-60 IU/kg), every 5 days (E5D, 45-60 IU/kg), or every 7 days (E7D, 60 IU/kg) at the investigator's discretion. Patients completing ≥50 exposure days and ≥6 months in the main study, or a 12-week safety expansion study that enrolled additional PTPs aged <6 years, could continue in the optional extension phase. Patients recorded bleeds and BAY 94-9027 usage in an electronic diary and were followed for safety assessments every 6 months. Analyses were based on age group at enrollment (<6 or 6 to <12 years). The study complied with the principles found in the Declaration of Helsinki. Results Of the 73 PTPs enrolled in the main or expansion study, 59 continued in the extension phase (n=32 aged <6 years; n=27 aged 6 to <12 years). Median age at enrollment was 5.0 years and median age at the end of the extension was 12.0 years. Median time in the extension study was 4.7 years in patients aged <6 years and 5.5 years in those aged 6 to <12 years; median exposure was 354.5 and 424.0 days, respectively (Table 1). Fifty-two patients completed ≥3 years of treatment and 39 patients completed ≥5 years. At the end of the extension, 29 patients were treated twice weekly, 20 patients were treated E5D and 10 patients were treated E7D. The median number of infusions per year was 78. Median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for total bleeds was 1.54 for all patients aged <6 years and 1.89 for those aged 6 to <12 years. Total ABR improved compared to the main study and was maintained during the extension. In the last 12 months of treatment, median spontaneous ABR was 0.0 in both age groups, however, trauma ABR was higher in patients aged <6 years (Figure 1). In the last 12 months, 19 patients (33.3%) had zero bleeds and 27 patients (47.4%) had zero joint bleeds. Overall, joint bleeds comprised 49.2% and 46.5% of total bleeds in younger and older patients, respectively, and predominantly affected ankle, knee and elbow joints. The majority of bleeds were mild (<6 years, 52.9%; 6 to <12 years, 30.8%) or moderate (<6 years, 39.3%; 6 to <12 years, aged <6; 55.5%) in severity. During the extension, 4 patients (6.8%) experienced study-drug-related adverse events (AEs): 1 patient (<6 years) had suspected FVIII inhibitors; 1 patient (<6 years) had severe muscle spasms; 1 patient (6 to <12 years) had suspected FVIII inhibitors; and 1 patient (6 to <12 years) had both suspected FVIII inhibitors and mild arthralgia. Two patients in the older group reported study-drug-related serious AEs (SAEs) of suspected FVIII inhibitors, neither of which was confirmed. Two patients aged <6 years discontinued, one due to an AE and one due to a non-study-drug-related SAE. No safety signals related to hypersensitivity or loss-of-efficacy were detected. A total of 11 patients (18.6%) had detectable PEG in plasma during the extension (n=6 aged <6 years; n=5 aged 6 to <12 years). PEG was detected at only a single time point in 6 patients and at repeated time points in 5 patients; in all cases, PEG levels were just above the detection limit (0.1 mg/L) and did not change over time, indicating steady-state was reached. Levels of renal biomarkers (Albumin, Beta-2 Microglobulin, Cystatin C, Kidney Injury Molecule-1, Lipocalin-2, proteinuria) were consistent over time, demonstrating normal renal function. Conclusion In both younger and older pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A, long-term treatment (median 5.8 years) with BAY 94-9027 prophylaxis was efficacious and well-tolerated. Financial support: Study funded by Bayer. Disclosures Ahuja: Genentech: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy; XaTec Inc.: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; XaTec Inc.: Research Funding; XaTec Inc.: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Fischer:Bayer, Baxter/Shire, SOBI/Biogen, CSL Behring, Octapharma, Pfizer, NovoNordisk: Research Funding; Bayer, Biogen, Pfizer, Baxter/Shire, and Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Bayer, Baxter, Biogen, CSL Behring, Freeline, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, and Sobi: Consultancy. Biss:Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria. Maas Enriquez:Bayer: Current Employment. Mancuso:Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sobi, Octapharma, Kedrion, Pfizer, Shire/Takeda, Biomarin, Grifols: Speakers Bureau; Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sobi, Octapharma, Kedrion, Shire/Takeda, Biomarin, Grifols, Catalyst: Honoraria; Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sobi, Octapharma, Kedrion, Pfizer, Shire/Takeda, PedNet Foundation: Consultancy. Wang:Bayer: Current Employment. Kenet:Bayer, Pfizer, Takeda, BioMarin, Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; PI Healthcare, CSL Behring: Honoraria; Bayer, Pfizer, Roche, Alnylam (Sanofi), Shire: Research Funding; Bayer, Pfizer, BioMarin, Takeda, Roche, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: BAY 94-9027 (damoctocog alfa pegol), current indication for patients with hemophilia A aged >12 years. We report efficacy and safety data in patients aged <12 years.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».