MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3095664938 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-135818

Subcutaneous Mosunetuzumab in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma: Promising Safety and Encouraging Efficacy in Dose Escalation Cohorts

2020· article· en· W3095664938 sur OpenAlexaff
Matthew J. Matasar, Chan Y. Cheah, Dok Hyun Yoon, Sarit Assouline, Nancy L. Bartlett, Matthew Ku, Pratyush Giri, Anna Johnston, Ian W. Flinn, André Goy, Dimitrios Tzachanis, Carol O’Hear, Shen Yin, Iris To, Kati Sarouei, Chi‐Chung Li, Brendan C. Bender, Elicia Penuel, Huang Huang, Lihua E. Budde

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Établissements canadiensRoche (Canada)Jewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRefractory (planetary science)MedicineLymphomaOncologyInternal medicineBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: More effective, less toxic treatments with convenient administration are needed for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphoma (B-NHL). Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is a full-length, fully humanized IgG1 CD20/CD3 bispecific antibody that redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. In an ongoing Phase I/Ib study (GO29781; NCT02500407), Mosun has shown promising efficacy and tolerable safety in pts with R/R B-NHL when administered intravenously (IV) in step-up doses (Bartlett, et al. ASCO 2019, Schuster, et al. ASH 2019). Subcutaneous (SC) administration of Mosun is an alternative approach to minimize the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a key adverse event (AE) associated with T-cell engaging immunotherapies. Other potential benefits of SC dosing include reduced healthcare resource utilization and increased convenience. This is the first report of clinical data with Mosun SC in pts with R/R B-NHL. Methods: GO29781 is a Phase I/Ib, open-label, multicenter dose-escalation and expansion study of Mosun in R/R B-NHL. Pts included in this report received single-agent Mosun SC on Day 1 of each 21-day Cycle (Q3W), for 8 cycles in pts with complete response (CR) and up to 17 cycles in pts with partial response or stable disease. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design; doses from 1.6-20 mg were assessed. Key outcome measures included best objective response (per Cheson 2007 criteria), tolerability and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Results: As of January 21 2020, 23 pts had received Mosun SC (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, n=10; follicular lymphoma [FL], n=5; marginal-zone lymphoma [MZL], n=3; primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, n=2; transformed [tr] FL, n=1; trMZL, n=1; tr nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, n=1). Median prior systemic therapies was 4 (range: 1-8); five pts (22%) had received prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Thirteen pts (57%) were refractory to last prior therapy and 16 (70%) were refractory to prior anti-CD20 therapy. The MTD was not reached. One dose-limiting toxicity (Grade [Gr] 4 neutropenia; resolved) was observed at dose 1.6mg. Among the 23 safety-evaluable pts, 22 (96%) experienced ≥1 AE; no AEs led to treatment discontinuation. Common (>20%) AEs related to Mosun SC were CRS (n=8, 35%), headache (n=5, 22%; all Gr 1) and injection site reaction (n=5, 22%; all Gr 1). All CRS events, graded by Lee criteria (Lee, et al. Blood 2014), occurred during Cycle 1 and were Gr 1 (n=6, 26%) or Gr 2 (n=2, 9%). In contrast to the Q3W fixed-dosing IV cohort, where 15% of pts experienced Gr 2 CRS at doses 0.05-2.8mg, no Gr 2 CRS occurred in the SC cohort at doses <13.5mg. In SC pts, CRS events resolved without tocilizumab treatment, intensive care unit admission or use of vasopressors. One pt required low-flow oxygen. No neurological symptoms (defined as any Preferred Terms in the nervous system disorders and psychiatric disorders system organ class) associated with CRS were reported. Neurological symptoms not associated with CRS occurred in nine pts (39%; all Gr 1) with headache (n=5, 22%) and tinnitus (n=2, 9%) as the most common AEs. Among the 22 efficacy-evaluable pts across all dose levels, overall response rates and CR rates were 86% (6/7) and 29% (2/7) in indolent NHL pts and 60% (9/15) and 20% (3/15) in aggressive NHL pts, respectively. After a median 6.9 months (range: 1.3-22.1) on study for all SC pts, all but one CR pt remained in remission at the cut-off date. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of Mosun SC is characterized by a slow absorption rate (observed Tmax at 72 hours post-dose and Cmax reduced by ~70% versus IV) and high bioavailability (>75%), supporting the use of SC dosing for CRS mitigation. Consistent with reduced CRS, lower peak IL-6 levels were observed with SC dosing, with delayed onset versus Mosun IV. Conclusions: Mosun SC demonstrated a manageable safety profile, encouraging efficacy and a favorable PK profile in heavily pretreated R/R B-NHL pts. CRS events seen in Cycle 1 were mild, transient and required minimal intervention and no Gr ≥3 CRS events were reported. Notably, less frequent Gr 2 CRS events were observed with Mosun SC at 7-fold higher dose levels versus the IV fixed-dosing group. These results support continued dose escalation and optimization of Mosun SC in R/R B-NHL. Updated clinical, PK and biomarker data, including approximately 20 additional pts from an interim expansion cohort, will be presented. Disclosures Matasar: Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Immunovaccine Technologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy; Rocket Medical: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cheah:Celgene, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Abbvie, MSD: Research Funding; Celgene, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, MSD, Janssen, Gilead, Ascentage Pharma, Acerta, Loxo Oncology, TG therapeutics: Honoraria. Yoon:Celltrion: Honoraria; Samyang: Research Funding; Amgen, Chongkundang, Celgene, Astrazeneca: Consultancy. Assouline:Takeda: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bartlett:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BTG: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Affimed Therapeutics: Research Funding. Ku:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria. Giri:Royal Adelaide Hospital: Current Employment. Johnston:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flinn:Loxo: Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nurix Therapeutics: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Calithera Biosciences: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Great Point Partners: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Curio Science: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; ArQule: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Iksuda Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Triphase Research & Development Corp.: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Yingli Pharmaceuticals ≠: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Other; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vincera Pharma: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Goy:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Hackensack UMC and University of Nebraska: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; RCCA/OMI: Current Employment; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; Regional Cancer Care Associates/OMI: Current Employment; Infinity Verastem: Research Funding; MD Anderson: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; CALBG: Research Funding; PracticeUpdate Oncology: Consultancy; Infinity: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; Xcenda: Consultancy; COTA: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: leadership role. Tzachanis:Fate: Research Funding; Incyte:

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations32
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchTravaux en français237 207