MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3096131635 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-134779

An Immune Senescence and Exhaustion-Related RNA Profile Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2020· article· en· W3096131635 sur OpenAlexaff
Jayakumar Vadakekolathu, Tung On Yau, Heidi Altmann, S. Church, Hanna A. Knaus, Mark D. Minden, Jan Davidson‐Moncada, Sarah K. Tasian, Martin Bornhäuser, Ivana Gojo, Leo Luznik, Sergio Rutella

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImmune systemMedicineOncologyCohortChemotherapy regimenInternal medicineGene signatureImmunologyChemotherapyBiologyGeneGene expression

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background Chemotherapy refractoriness and disease relapse continue to be significant obstacles to therapeutic success in AML. We have recently identified bone marrow (BM) transcriptomic profiles that stratify patients with AML into an immune-infiltrated and an immune-depleted subtype and that refine the accuracy of survival prediction in response to conventional chemotherapy beyond that afforded by cytogenetic and molecular prognosticators (Vadakekolathu J, et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020; 12: eaaz0463). Importantly, AML CD8+ T cells exhibit features of immune exhaustion and senescence (IES), including the upregulation of natural killer (NK) cell-associated transcripts, which persist only in chemotherapy non-responders (Knaus HA, et al. JCI Insight 2018; 3: e120974). The aim of the current study was to determine whether IES correlate with immune infiltration and with clinical outcomes in AML. Methods We used prior knowledge and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to derive a 68-gene IES signature score (computed as the cohort-wide average of gene expression) from publicly available RNA-sequencing datasets (TCGA and Beat-AML Master Trial; 162 and 281 AML patients, respectively). The wet-lab AML cohorts used in this study included a total of 382 BM samples from children and adults with AML treated with curative intent. BMs were collected at time of diagnosis, complete remission (CR) and relapse (PMCC, SAL and CHOP series). BM RNAs were profiled on the nCounter platform using the PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA). Results In the AML discovery cohort, the IES score significantly correlated with BM lymphoid infiltration (R=0.958) and with CD8+ T cell (R=0.88), cytotoxic T cell (R=0.90) and tumor inflammation signature scores (R=0.82, P<0.0001 for all; Fig. 1A). The novel IES gene signature showed minimal overlap with previously discovered interferon (IFN)-related gene sets with prognostic relevance in AML (Fig. 1B) and was higher in TP53-mutated (P<0.0001) and RUNX1-mutated (P=0.0071) compared with WT AML. Overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in patients with higher than median IES scores (Fig. 1C). IES signature scores were also associated with worse clinical outcomes in Beat-AML cases (median OS of 10.6 and 21.1 months, respectively, in patients with higher and lower than median IES scores; Fig. 1D) and were higher in primary induction failures (PIF) compared with chemotherapy responders (Fig. 1E). The top IES genes associated with survival prediction both in TCGA and Beat-AML, although not overlapping with published IFN-related gene sets, were still significantly enriched in type I/II IFN signaling pathways and in molecular functions indicative of heightened ion-gated channel activity, as shown by protein-protein interaction network analyses. The above findings were validated in independent wet-lab cohorts comprising adults (PMCC series; n=290; SAL series; n=46) and children (CHOP series; n=46) with AML. In the ELN adverse risk subgroup (PMCC cohort), both relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS were significantly shorter in patients with higher than median compared with lower than median IES scores (median RFS time of 6.93 versus not reached [log-rank P=0.0053], and median OS of 10.5 months versus 18 months [log-rank P=0.0011], respectively). In contrast, the IES signature score failed to stratify survival in patients with ELN favorable and intermediate risk. Finally, a pairwise comparison of matched diagnostic, CR and relapse BM samples (SAL series; n=22 patients and CHOP series; n=46 patients) showed significantly higher IES signature scores at time of CR, congruent with chemotherapy-induced acceleration of IES, and at time of post-chemotherapy relapse compared with disease onset (Fig. 1F). Notably, CD8A, TBX21, a Th1 transcription factor, and markers of NK cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, including KLRK1, KLRD1, KLRC2, GNLY, and granzymes, were among the top ranked immune genes associated with AML relapse (Fig. 1G). Conclusions Patients with immune-infiltrated AML exhibit features of IES, which may correlate with adverse-risk molecular features, chemotherapy refractoriness and shorter survival. Molecular circuits reflective of IES might also underpin AML relapse after conventional induction chemotherapy. IES T cells could be functionally rejuvenated by novel immunotherapies being investigated in AML. Figure 1 Disclosures Church: NanoString Technologies, Inc.: Current Employment. Davidson-Moncada:Macrogenics: Current Employment. Tasian:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Aleta Biotherapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Gojo:Amphivena: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Luznik:WindMil Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Patent holder; AbbVie: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding. Rutella:Kura Oncology: Research Funding; MacroGenics, Inc.: Research Funding; NanoString Technologies, Inc.: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207