Long wavelength near-infrared hyperspectral imaging for classification and quality assessment of bulk samples of wheat from different growing locations and crop years
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A platform technology is identified for grain handling facilities to improve grading and determine non-destructively different quality parameters of wheat. In this study, a near-infrared (NIR) hyperspectral imaging system was used to scan four wheat classes namely, Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS), Canada Prairie Spring Red (CPSR), Canada Western Hard White Spring (CWHWS), and Canada Western Soft White Spring (CWSWS) that were collected from across various growing regions in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta in 2007, 2008, and 2009 crop years. A database of the near-infrared (NIR) hyperspectral image cubes of bulk samples of four wheat classes at three moisture levels for each class was created. These image cubes were acquired in the wavelength region of 960-1700 nm with 10 nm intervals. Wheat classification was done using the non-parametric statistical and a four-layer back propagation neural network (BPNN) classifiers. Average classification accuracies of 93.1 and 83.9% for identifying wheat classes using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), respectively, were obtained for two-class identification models that included variations of moisture levels, growing locations, and crop years of samples. In the pair-wise moisture discrimination study, near-perfect classifications were achieved for wheat samples which had difference in moisture levels of about 6%. The NIR wavelengths of 1260-1380 nm had the highest factor loadings for the first principal component using the principal components analysis (PCA). A four-layer BPNN classifier was used for two-class identification of wheat classes and moisture levels. Overall average pair-wise classification accuracies of 83.7% were obtained for discriminating wheat samples based on their moisture contents. Classification accuracies of 83.2, 75.4, 73.1%, on average, were obtained for identifying wheat classes for samples with 13, 16, and 19% moisture content (m.c.), respectively. Ten-factor partial least squares regression (PLSR) and principal components regression (PCR) models were developed using a ten-fold cross validation for prediction. Prediction performances of PLSR and PCR models were assessed by calculating the estimated mean square errors of prediction (MSEP), standard error of cross-validation (SECV), and correlation coefficient (r). Overall, PLSR models demonstrated better prediction performances than the PCR models for predicting protein contents and hardness of wheat.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».