Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Vincent BWdard. When Goethe wrote the phrase that serves as an epigraph for this essay, he was thinking about artistic practice. But its truth seems to fit our present context so obviously that I don't hesitate to hazard an analogy, in itself always a delicate maneuver. Moreover, during the course of this paper, I will turn to the originality of Goethe's vision once again, this time to evoke certain specific points of his epistemology and methodology. But for the moment, it is the relations of humankind to technology that engages us, more precisely, the ethical questions arising from the unprecedented technological developments in the Western world over the past few decades. To that general problematic, concerning which some philosophers of technology have coined the neologism technoethics, is associated another of a practical kind: many professions-medicine, law, engineering, journalism, etc.-are currently caught in unprecedented conflicts for the most part also the result of accelerated technological development, which their respective professional code of ethics didn't foresee and are unable to resolve. This is the case with design as well. The two questions that I just raised were the topic of a collective research project calied, Promethe Eclaire (or Prometheus Enlightened): Ethics, Technology and Professional Responsibility in Design, carried out at the School of Industrial Design at the University of Montreal. The project was part of a vast program, devoted to applied ethics, designated as strategic by the Canadian Council for Research in the Human Sciences.' We set ourselves the task of establishing the general problematic of design ethics, in the broad context of technological ethics or technoethics, and to examine in this light the manner in which the responsibility of designers can be reevaluated. This paper presents some partial conclusions that I believed were worth drawing. They most directly concern design theory, the practice and teaching of design, but in some respects they touch equally on aesthetics. But before presenting these conclusions, I wish to make two clarifications on the use of the words technoethics and design. This research project has given rise to numerous endeavors and publications. Thus, 4 special numbers of the journal Informel were devoted to the theme of the project 3 (2, Summer 1990); 4 (1-2, Winter and Summer 1991); 5 (1, Winter 1992). These papers constituted preparatory documents for a colloquium that was held May 8-11, 1991 at the University of Montreal and whose proceedings have been edited by the author under the title: Promethee eclaire. Ethique, technique et responsabilite professionnelle en design, Montreal, Ed. Informel, 1993. The application of the conclusions to architecture and engineering were also examined by the author.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,015 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».