MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3096697285 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-136344

A Phase 2 Study of Odronextamab (REGN1979), a CD20 x CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

2020· article· en· W3096697285 sur OpenAlexaff
Tae Min Kim, Arancha Alonso, Miles Prince, Michał Taszner, Seok‐Goo Cho, Don A. Stevens, Michelle Poon, Francesca Lim, Steven Le Gouill, Cecilia Carpio, Mary‐Margaret Keating, Lieve Adriaens, Melanie Ufkin, Ayesha Sabir, Jingjin Li, Vladimir Janković, Min Zhu, Jurriaan Brouwer‐Visser, Siyang Leng, L. Andres Sirulnik, Aafia Chaudhry, Srikanth Ambati, Kim Won Seog

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTolerabilityCD20LymphomaInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)OncologyFollicular lymphomaAntibodyPhases of clinical researchGastroenterologyChemotherapyAdverse effectImmunologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) remains an area of high unmet patient need and no curative options are currently available. Odronextamab (REGN1979) is a first-in-class, hinge-stabilized, fully human IgG4-based bispecific antibody that binds to CD20-expressing cells and CD3 on T cells, targeting CD20+ cells via T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity independent of T-cell receptor recognition. The safety, tolerability, and anti-tumor activity of odronextamab monotherapy was evaluated in a global, multicenter, Phase 1 study in heavily pretreated patients with R/R B-NHL (NCT02990951; Bannerji et al, ASH 2019). Intravenous infusion of odronextamab has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile at doses up to 320 mg weekly (QW), and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Broad and durable anti-tumor responses were observed in both indolent and aggressive lymphomas, including in patients who progressed after prior CAR T-cell therapy. An assessment of pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety data from the Phase 1 study informed the recommended Phase 2 dosing regimens. METHODS: This global, Phase 2, open-label, multi-cohort study (R1979-ONC-1625; NCT03888105) is designed to assess the anti-tumor activity and safety of odronextamab in patients with B-NHL. There are five disease-specific cohorts, each with independent parallel enrollment. The study includes patients with: (1) R/R follicular lymphoma (FL) Grade 1-3a after ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy, including an anti-CD20 antibody and an alkylating agent; (2) R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy, including an anti-CD20 antibody and an alkylating agent; (3) R/R mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) following or with failure to tolerate Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy; (4) R/R marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy; (5) other R/R B-NHL subtypes, excluding Waldenström macroglobulinemia, after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy (Fig. 1). Estimated total enrollment is 481 patients. Key eligibility criteria are: age ≥18 years; not appropriate for other approved therapy with established benefit; ≥1 bi-dimensionally measurable nodal lesion of ≥1.5 cm; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1; and adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. Key exclusion criteria are: prior anti-CD20 x CD3 bispecific antibody therapy; prior CAR T-cell therapy; primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma or known involvement by non-primary CNS NHL; and history of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Odronextamab is administered using a step-up dose schedule consisting of an initial dose at Week (W)1, an intermediate dose at W2, and thereafter, a fixed weekly dose until W12 followed by maintenance Q2W dosing until progression or discontinuation (Fig. 2). The dose for indolent B-NHL is 80 mg QW followed by 160 mg Q2W, and for aggressive B-NHL is 160 mg QW followed by 320 mg Q2W. All patients with durable complete responses of 9 months will transition from Q2W to Q4W dosing. The primary endpoint for each cohort is objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review, as assessed from first dose until completion of 28 weeks of study treatment, or study withdrawal. Secondary endpoints include complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, disease control rate (DCR), overall survival, incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and patient-reported outcomes. ORR, CR rate and DCR with a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) will be summarized. Time-to-event endpoints will be summarized by median and corresponding 95% CI using the Kaplan-Meier method. The study is actively accruing patients at sites across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. Disclosures Kim: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Voronoi: Consultancy; Boryung: Consultancy; AstraZeneca and Korea Health Industry Development Institute: Research Funding. Stevens:Amgen, MorphoSys: Consultancy. Poon:Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen, Roche, Novartis: Honoraria. Le Gouill:Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Consultancy; Roche Genentech, Janssen-Cilag and Abbvie, Celgene, Jazz pharmaceutical, Gilead-kite, Loxo, Daiichi-Sankyo and Servier: Honoraria. Carpio:Takeda, Regeneron: Consultancy. Keating:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Taiho: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Adriaens:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: Dosing regime that mitigates cytokine release syndrome for therapeutic antibodies (status: pending). Ufkin:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sabir:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Li:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Jankovic:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhu:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Brouwer-Visser:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Leng:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sirulnik:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chaudhry:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ambati:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Won Seog:Roche, Takeda, J&J, Kyowa-Kirin, Celltrion ,Pfizer, Donga: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: The Trial in Progress abstract will report on use of odronextamab in a Phase 2 clinical trial of patients with B-NHL

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCAR-T cell therapy researchTravaux en français237 207