MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3096749218 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-134741

Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Adults: A Two-Decade Provincial Retrospective Review

2020· article· en· W3096749218 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer Croden, Jennifer Grossman, Haowei Sun

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInterquartile rangeHemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosisRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsProportional hazards modelHazard ratioCohortEpidemiologySurvival analysisInternal medicineDiseaseIntensive care medicineConfidence interval

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare clinical syndrome characterized by uncontrolled immune activation, resulting in multi-organ dysfunction and a high risk of death. Due to scarcity of data in adults, the diagnosis remains challenging and has been historically associated with a delayed time to diagnosis and heterogeneous practice patterns. We examined the processes of care measures and outcomes in a large cohort of adults with HLH. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study examined the epidemiology, management, and outcomes of adult inpatients (≥18 years) diagnosed with HLH in the province of Alberta, Canada from January 1999 to December 2019. Patients were identified via International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, and those who met the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria were included. Chart reviews were performed to collect demographics, clinical and laboratory characteristics, process of care measures, and outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from hospital presentation to death. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were assessed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association between time to diagnosis and the hazard of death, adjusting for patient and disease characteristics. Results: 83 patients met the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria; 1 had a clear alternative diagnosis, hence 82 were included in the final data analysis. The median age of the cohort was 47 (interquartile range, IQR 32-62) years; 57 (70%) were male. The etiologies of HLH were as follows: malignancy (38%), infection (35%), autoimmune disease (16%), and idiopathic/others (11%). The most common clinical and laboratory findings were hyperferritinemia (100%), fever (99%), cytopenias (94%), hypofibrinogenemia and/or hypertriglycermidemia (91%), and hemophagocytosis on biopsy (89%). The median H-score was 244, with no significant difference across HLH etiologies. Interim data analysis showed that sCD25, natural killer (NK) cell activity, and molecular studies were ordered in 69%, 36%, and 29% of cases. The median length of hospitalization was 33 days (IQR 16-62), with a 30-day mortality rate of 25.6%. A majority of patients (55%) required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (Table 1). The median OS was 8.5 months. Patients with malignancy-associated HLH had a significantly worse median OS compared with those with non-malignancy-associated HLH (2.1 vs 54.5 months, p=0.0004; Figure 1). There were no differences in the median OS between B-cell (n=11) and T/NK lymphoproliferative disorders (n=13), or between new cancer diagnosis (n=27) and active cancer receiving chemotherapy (n=4). Age (adjusted hazards ratio, aHR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.10), Charlson comorbidity index (aHR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.8), and ICU admission (aHR 4.1, 95% CI 1.4-12.2) were associated with increased hazards of death on multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Malignancy was associated with increased hazard of death on univariate analysis (HR 2.8, 95% 1.5-4.9), but did not remain as an independent prognostic factor on multivariable analysis (aHR 1.0, 95% 0.4-2.6). Sex, delayed diagnosis, or peak ferritin level were not significant predictors of mortality. The median times from presentation to diagnosis and from presentation to therapy were 10 days (IQR 2-19) and 14 days (IQR 6-25), respectively. Practice patterns varied significantly between centers without differences in survival outcome (log-rank p=0.8). Most patients (83%) received corticosteroids, whereas etoposide, intravenous gammaglobulin, and cyclosporine were administered in 38%, 34%, and 18%, respectively. Twelve (15%) patients did not receive any HLH-specific treatment, mostly in infection-associated HLH (n=8). Of the 31 patients receiving steroids and etoposide, 21 (68%), 12 (39%), and 20 (65%) receivedpneumocystis jirovecii, antiviral, and antifungal prophylaxis, respectively. Conclusion: In our two-decade provincial study, we observed that delayed diagnosis and treatment heterogeneity were common. Older age, comorbidities, and ICU admission were independent predictors of poor survival, whereas delayed diagnosis and malignant HLH were not. Development of a standardized provincial diagnostic and treatment protocol has the potential to improve the quality of care in adult HLH. Disclosures Sun: Sanofi:Other: Advisory board;Octapharma:Other: Advisory board;Pfizer:Other: Advisory board;Octapharma:Research Funding;Novo Nordisk:Other: Advisory board.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,612
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,780

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,302
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchTravaux en français237 207