VWF/ADAMTS13 Ratios Are Potential Markers of Immunothrombotic Complications in Patients with COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND. COVID-19 is a prothrombotic disease, characterized by both arterial and venous thrombosis. The pathogenesis of coagulopathy in COVID-19 is multifactorial, with activation of endothelial cells, platelets, neutrophils, and other immune system effectors playing crucial roles. High levels of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and reduced levels of ADAMTS13 have been observed in COVID-19, sepsis, and immunothrombotic states, and an elevated VWF/ADAMTS13 ratio has been previously described in ischemic stroke1. In this study, we sought to evaluate potential associations of VWF activity and antigen ratios to ADAMTS13 with clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and to compare these ratios with other cytokines and markers of inflammation in critical illness. METHODS. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study. Blood was collected from 49 hospitalized patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between April 13 and April 24, 2020, which included 40 patients in an intensive care unit and 9 on a non-ICU unit. Medical records were reviewed, and patient characteristics including age, sex, comorbidities, pertinent medications, imaging studies, history of arterial or venous thrombosis, and other pertinent patient information were compiled. Blood was collected in sodium citrate tubes and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 minutes, with the resulting plasma supernatant used for further testing. Measurements of VWF antigen and VWF activity were performed on an ACL TOP machine using our institution's standard clinical laboratory protocol. Biomarker profiling analyses were performed at Eve Technologies (Calgary, Alberta, Canada). Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (v8.4.3, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) and R (v4, R Core Team, 2020). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS. The median age was 64 years; 36 (73%) were male, 11 (22.4%), 29 (59.2%), and 9 (18.4%) had BMI<25, between 25 and 40, and >40 kg/m2, respectively. The ratio of VWF activity/ADAMTS13 was significantly higher in patients with higher BMI (median [interquartile range, IQR] VWF activity/ADAMTS13 ratios: 0.66 [0.39-0.88] for BMI<25 kg/m2, 0.865 [0.769-1.102] for BMI 25-40 kg/m2, and 1.041 [0.747-2.032] for BMI>40 kg/m2; p = 0.0408, Kruskal-Wallis test). In patients who required mechanical ventilation, median [IQR] VWF activity/ADAMTS13 was 0.876 [0.75-1.769] vs 0.792 [0.566-0.932] for those who did not (p = 0.0497, Mann-Whitney U-test). The difference for the VWF antigen/ADAMTS13 ratio was more pronounced, 1.32 [0.991-2.456] vs 0.981 [0.628-1.162] (p = 0.0045, Mann-Whitney U-test). There was also a significant correlation between both VWF activity/ADAMTS13 and VWF antigen/ADAMTS13 ratios and neutrophil indices such as absolute neutrophil count (R = 0.57, p <0.0001 and R = 0.54, p = 0.0001, respectively) and neutrophil to lymphocyte count (R = 0.6, p <0.0001 and R = 0.57, p <0.0001, respectively). We also found significant correlations of these ratios with markers of neutrophils activation (HGF, resistin, and lipocalin-2; Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS. Ratios VWF activity/ADAMTS13 and VWF antigen/ADAMTS13 are elevated in patients with more severe COVID-19 disease and correlate with markers of neutrophils activation. These findings and that azurophillic granules in neutrophils contain α-defensins implicated in thrombosis2 suggest possible mechanistic links among VWF, ADAMTS13, contact pathway, and neutrophil function in mediating immunothrombotic complications in COVID-19, which might highlight potential therapeutic targets to attenuate the severity of coagulopathy and merit further investigation with a larger cohort of patients. REFERENCES 1. Taylor A, et al. Blood Adv. 2020;4(2):398-407 2. Abu-Fanne R, et al. Blood. 2019;133(5):481-493 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».