The Mutational Landscape of Cold Agglutinin Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Primary cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia mediated by monoclonal IgM autoantibodies directed against the I antigen on erythrocytes. CAD is due to a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the bone marrow. We have previously reported recurrentKMT2DandCARD11mutations and trisomy 3 and 12 or 18 in CAD patients (Malecka et al., 2018 & 2020). In addition, we have revealed that the cold-reactive antibody is highly stereotyped (Malecka et al., 2016). In this study, we present new and detailed data on the mutation landscape of CAD patients. We have analyzed the bone marrow from 14 patients with CAD, included in a recent clinical trial (Berentsen et al., 2017), by whole exome sequencing. Clonal B cells and normal T cells (normal control) were acquired using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The data from whole exome sequencing were aligned to the human genome hg38 and analyzed as described before (Malecka et al., 2020). Variant discovery and functional annotation were performed with the use of GATK4 tools: Mutect2 and Funcotator. Detected mutations were validated manually using IGV browser. The total amount of non-synonymous mutations detected in each CAD sample ranged from 13 to 62, while the total amount of all mutations in the exome regions ranged from 36 to 163 (Figure 1A). Four genes showed non-synonymous mutations in 3 or more cases, these are:KMT2D(8/14; 57%),IGLL5(5/14; 36%),CARD11(3/14; 21%),CXCR4(3/14; 21%) (Figure 1B and Table 1). Additionally, several genes showed non-synonymous mutations in 2 of the 14 cases (14%):PHLDB1, HIST1H1E, LPIN3, LTB, MACF1, NBEA, NEFH, PCNX2, RRAGC, TMPRSS7, ZNF618(Figure 1B). A majority of these genes are also found mutated in lymphoma. All patients with eitherCARD11orCXCR4mutations have concurrentKMT2Dmutations. One patient has bothCARD11andCXCR4mutations together withKMT2Dmutation. Recurrent mutations seem to cluster in some of the cases (Figure 1C). Almost all patients with aKMT2Dmutation (7/8, 87%) have at least 3 other recurrent mutations. Patients with aCARD11(3 cases) or aCXCR4(3 cases) mutation have at least 3 other recurrent mutations. KMT2Dmutations are found in many lymphomas and are associated with Kabuki syndrome. It is suggested thatKMT2Dis a tumor suppressor gene, andKMT2Dmutations might act as driver mutations in many lymphomas. In addition,CARD11mutations in our cases are located in coiled-coil domain in exon 6, and therefore it is expected to result in NF-kB activation (Malecka et al. 2018).IGLL5is located in the IG lambda locus. The function of theIGLL5gene is unknown, but it is homologues to theIGLL1gene known to be important in B cell development.IGLL5mutations are seen in lymphoma as well as other malignancies and might have some prognostic value in diseases like multiple myeloma.CXCR4has been implicated in the migration and trafficking of malignant B cells in several hematological malignancies.CXCR4mutations are frequently seen in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, and almost always in combination with aMYD88mutation. In our series, aCXCR4mutation always occurs in combination with aKMT2Dmutation.MYD88was not found to be mutated. Detected mutations in theCXCR4gene are of potential therapeutic interest, sinceCXCR4inhibitors exist. CAD patients with aKMT2Dmutation associated with other recurrent mutations (Figure 1C), show a trend to lower hemoglobin levels at diagnosis compared to patients with noKMT2Dmutation or patients withKMT2Dmutation without other recurrent mutations. We are currently working on sequencing clonal B cells from additional patients in order to confirm these findings. In conclusion, CAD-associated lymphoproliferative disease shows a relatively low mutation burden. but with recurrent gene mutations. The most common recurrent mutations are in genes known to be involved in lymphoma development. Our preliminary data suggest thatKMT2Dmutation associated with other recurrent mutations might determine severity of hemolysis. Disclosures Tierens: Amgen:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Jazz Pharmaceuticals:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Astellas Pharma:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.Berentsen:Mundipharma:Research Funding;Apellis Pharmaceuticals:Consultancy, Other: lecture honoraria;Bioverativ:Consultancy, Other: lecture honoraria;Janssen-Cilag:Other: lecture honoraria;Momenta Pharmaceuticals:Consultancy;True North Therapeutics:Other: lecture honoraria;Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc,:Other: lecture honoraria.Tjønnfjord:Mundipharma:Other: A grant from Mundipharma to cover the expenses of bendamustine for the CAD5 study.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».