441 - Treatment adequacy for depression and anxiety disorders affects quality of life in older adults consulting in primary care
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Previous studies show that less than 50% of adults in Canada receive guideline- concordant care for depression and anxiety disorders. Studies on the long-term effects of receiving adequate care for depression and anxiety disorders are scarce, particularly in older adults. This study aimed to assess the 3-year change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and satisfaction with life associated with receipt of adequate care for depression and anxiety disorders. Method This study was conducted among a sample of 219 older adults recruited in primary care with a common mental disorder (depression or an anxiety disorder) who participated in Quebec’s longitudinal ESA-Services (2011-2016) study. The definition of adequacy of care was based on Canadian guidelines and relevant literature. Administrative and self-reported data were used to measure treatment adequacy at baseline. HRQOL was measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and satisfaction with life was assessed with the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). HRQOL and satisfaction with life were measured at baseline and follow-up, 3 years later. Multivariate fixed-effects models were carried out to assess the association between adequacy of care and change in quality of life controlling for individual and healthcare system factors in the overall sample as well as separately for depression and anxiety. Results The results showed that 56%, 37% and 40% of participants received adequate pharmacological or psychological treatment for depression, anxiety, and overall. Receipt of adequate treatment was associated with on average 4 more points on the VAS (0-100) and 1.7 points on the SWLS (5-25). After controlling for potential confounders, patients receiving adequate care for depression had on average 11 more points on the VAS. Treatment adequacy for anxiety disorders and depression or anxiety disorders overall were not associated with change in HRQOL or satisfaction with life. Conclusion Older adults receiving adequate mental health care had better HRQOL and satisfaction with life. Treatment adequacy for depression was associated with change in quality of life; but not for individuals with anxiety. Future studies should focus on different patient indicators of quality of care which may better predict long-term effects of treatment for people with anxiety.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».