MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3097858251 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-136991

Clonally Expanded Bone Marrow T Cells Show Effector Differentiation and Rarely Recognize Disease-Associated Antigens in Multiple Myeloma

2020· article· en· W3097858251 sur OpenAlexaff
Carlotta Welters, Meng-Tung Hsu, Christian Stein, Livius Penter, María Fernanda Lammoglia Cobo, Kerstin Dietze, Eric Blanc, Dieter Beule, Lars Bullinger, Julian Strobel, Holger Hackstein, Armin Gerbitz, Klaus Dornmair, Thomas Blankenstein, Leo Hansmann

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyBone marrowCytotoxic T cellAntigenMultiple myelomaImmunologyCD8T cellImmune systemCancer researchIn vitro

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Multiple myeloma is a malignancy of monoclonal plasma cells accumulating in the bone marrow. The critical influence of tumor-infiltrating T cells on disease control and therapeutic responses has been shown in a variety of malignancies, however, the role of multiple myeloma bone marrow-infiltrating T cells is incompletely understood. Although it has been shown that multiple myeloma neo-antigen-specific T cells can be expanded in vitro, little is known about functions and specificities of clonally expanded multiple myeloma-infiltrating bone marrow T cells. Here we asked at the single cell level whether clonally expanded T cells i) were detectable in multiple myeloma bone marrow and peripheral blood, ii) showed characteristic immune phenotypes, and iii) recognized antigens selectively presented on multiple myeloma cells. A total of 6,744 single bone marrow T cells from 13 treatment-naïve patients were index-sorted and sequenced using our methodologies for determination of paired T cell receptor (TCR) αβ sequences along with immune phenotype, transcription factor and cytokine expression. Clonal T cell expansion occurred predominantly within the CD8+ compartment. Phenotypes of clonally expanded T cells were distinctive of cytolytic effector differentiation and significantly different from non-expanded CD8+ T cells. Less than 25% of expanded CD8+ T cell clones expressed the immune checkpoint molecules programmed death-1 (PD-1), cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), or T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3), while B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) was expressed on more than half of the expanded clones. Clonal T cell expansion did not correlate with neo-antigen load as determined by whole exome and RNA sequencing of purified multiple myeloma cells. Furthermore, peripheral blood TCRβ repertoire sequencing from five selected patients with substantial bone marrow T cell expansion identified 90% of expanded bone marrow T cell clones overlapping with peripheral blood. To determine whether clonally expanded bone marrow T cells recognized antigens selectively presented on multiple myeloma cells, 71 dominant TCRs from five selected patients with substantial clonal T cell expansion were re-expressed in 58α-β- T-hybridoma reporter T cells and co-incubated with CD38-enriched multiple myeloma cells from the same patients. Only one of these TCRs recognized antigens selectively presented on multiple myeloma cells and this TCR was not neo-antigen-specific. Hypothesizing that the target antigen was a non-mutated self-antigen, we could show that this TCR also recognized the plasma cell leukemia cell line U-266 in an HLA-A*02:01-restricted manner. In summary, clonally expanded T cells in multiple myeloma bone marrow of newly diagnosed patients show cytolytic effector differentiation. In the majority of patients, clonally expanded bone marrow T cells do not recognize antigens presented on multiple myeloma cells and are not neo-antigen-specific. Our findings are relevant for the design of future therapeutics and clinical trials. The identified TCR, which recognizes a multiple myeloma antigen shared with U-266 in an HLA-A*02:01-restricted manner, could be a promising candidate for T cell therapy. Disclosures Bullinger: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→