Characterizing Ionospheric Disturbances for Space Weather Hazard Mitigation
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<p>The world relies increasingly on capabilities that are enabled or delivered by space-based systems, and there exists a need to continually refine our vulnerability assessment models and understanding of natural versus artificial threats. One area of growing global focus is monitoring and mitigating hazards for space-based systems that are highly dependent on the space atmospheric environment. For example, in 2018 the United States defined benchmarks for five space weather phenomena critical to vulnerability assessment for national infrastructure and services, and for stakeholder mitigation planning. We were invited to lead the next-phase national working group in benchmarking of ionospheric disturbances to capture physical properties of the medium and response to solar drivers; key parameters include ionospheric electron content, turbulence, and absorption that characterize the medium for radio propagation. All such values translate readily into impacts on existing and emerging technologies for users/operators.</p><p>In this context we present new methods of ionospheric characterization and parameterization to gain insight into the impact on ground- and space-based RF systems. Our approach exploits the University of Calgary Transition Region Explorer (TREx) network for geospace sensing – a federal investment in over 40 sophisticated optical, magnetic and radio instruments across Canada. Combined with our modeling tools, this is one of the world’s foremost high latitude facilities for remote sensing of the near-earth space environment. On track to be fully operational in 2020, our ground-based infrastructure includes new technologies in auroral cameras and imaging riometers. At distributed key locations within the target region, multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) total electron content (TEC)/scintillation receivers and commercial grade systems also provide multi-scale scientific observations.</p><p>We present space weather monitoring for ground-based and space-based RF systems. Our ionosphere modeling capabilities include a data driven approach to estimate the three-dimensional temporally evolving electron density distributions over regional spatial scales. Input observations can include integrated TEC for multi-constellation GNSS signals from ground-based receivers, topside over-satellite TEC from space-borne GNSS receivers (e.g. Swarm), and GNSS occulting link TEC from low-earth orbiters. We also exploit small-scale Swarm in situ plasma density observations to estimate ionospheric turbulence. We focus on two recent studies:</p><p>1) The assimilation of imaging riometer observations to provide D-region specification and estimation of key space weather parameters for HF applications.</p><p>2) Ionospheric scintillation modeling based on turbulence key parameters for transionospheric RF signal propagation and related applications such as GNSS.</p><p>Outcomes include new approaches in space situational awareness and monitoring of space environmental conditions with improved anomaly resolution (distinguishing artificial from natural hazards) and informed mitigation.</p>
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle