MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3098525252 · doi:10.1353/wsj.2020.0020

Stevens’s Epistolary Surrogates

2020· article· de· W3098525252 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
George S. Lensing

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œWallace Stevens journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languede
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePoetry Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWifeDowntownTRIPS architectureDaughterHistoryGeorge (robot)HousewifeArt historyArchaeologyLawPolitical scienceEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Stevens’s Epistolary Surrogates George S. Lensing FROM HIS BOYHOOD in Reading, Pennsylvania, to his college years in Cambridge, Massachusetts, to his early adulthood in New York, and then through almost forty years at his more permanent home in Hartford, Connecticut, the life of Wallace Stevens was largely sedentary and increasingly solitary. Over the course of his life, his travels were few. After completing law school he made a seven-week fishing and hunting trip to Canada, and early in his career at The Hartford he made trips to the Midwest and annual trips by train from Hartford through the American South to Florida. There was a trip by boat with his wife through the Panama Canal and up the Pacific Coast to California, and—back in Hartford—occasional day trips by train into New York. With his wife and daughter, Stevens vacationed a few times at various resorts and, later, made brief return visits to Reading. But his greater and lifelong wish to visit Europe never materialized, even though later in life there were opportunities and invitations to do so. Even at home he never owned an automobile or learned to drive one. His daily trip of two miles from his home to the office and then home again was made by foot. At the same time, and with very few exceptions, there were no guests in the Stevens home in Hartford where he lived with his wife, Elsie, and his daughter, Holly. And even within that home, husband and wife lived for the most part independently. As his daughter said of him, “one might say that my father lived alone” (H. Stevens 4). I mention all this only because we know from the poems themselves that Stevens was a passionate man of strong desires and needs, which were especially prevalent in the various poems of spring and summer. Toward the end of his life, Stevens confessed in a letter to Barbara Church, “Yet I have never liked going to the places to which other people go or doing the things they do. . . . The truth is that one gets out of contact with people during the summer and feels the immense need . . . of people for other people, a thing that has been in my thoughts for a long time, in one form or another” (L 759). The poems themselves disclose a strong and consistent interest in and use of foreign lands, customs, and people. In Bart Eeckhout and Edward Ragg’s collection of essays called Wallace Stevens across the Atlantic, my own contribution is entitled “‘The Switzerland of the Mind’: Stevens’ Invention of Europe.” In spite of his largely sedentary [End Page 173] and solitary life, one of the ways that Stevens sustained these desires for the foreign and the poems that were rooted in them was through his correspondence, perhaps the chief means. In thinking about the importance of his letters for both Stevens the man and Stevens the poet, I found one question that kept returning. From where and what does the need, even passion, for the company of some of his correspondents derive within the poet himself? What exactly were the lacunae and absences in his own life that were filled, or at least partially filled, or even attempted to be filled, by letters and postcards? I came to the conclusion that Stevens often invented in his letters what I am calling selected surrogates, who, by his own epistolary constructions, transported and transformed the exterior world in order to satisfy his personal needs and provide him with gratifications and, in many such instances, to become the foundation for poems that followed, as I hope to demonstrate. The letters themselves constitute a kind of surrogacy—imagined recipients in the absence of their immediate physical presence. A similar act of the imagination comes into play when the addressee constructs a personality and presence founded solely upon the content and style of the letter itself. If the recipient is an acquaintance or friend, the letter writer’s memories of that person hover in the background. Of course, a letter’s artificial monologue substitutes for the more easy exchange of live, dynamic, and immediate conversation: here the discourse is...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,733
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,000
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œWallace Stevens journalMême sujetPoetry Analysis and CriticismTravaux en français237 207