Network Optimization Models at Greater Kuparuk Area Using Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The Greater Kuparuk Area, located on the North Slope of Alaska, began production in 1981 and has produced over 2.5 billion barrels to date. The area contains six oil fields flowing into three central processing facilities with 47 drillsites and over 1,200 production and injection wells. The facilities are primarily gas constrained due to limits from the gas lift compressors, and secondarily water constrained due to injection pump capacity. An optimization program using the equal slope concept is currently in use for lift gas allocation. A previous attempt to more rigorously optimize the production system using commercial software resulted in better lift gas allocation, but computation time lead to the cessation of its use for daily optimization. The objective of this work was to develop a fast, flexible optimization model that recommends well status, lift gas rates, and water injection rates. The model uses field data and data generated by the previous surface models to develop the hydraulic models as well as current facility conditions and constraints. The model contains four components. The first was a function that estimates producer and injector performance. The second is a function that gathers and interpolates well performance models with physics-based models. Third, the drillsite header pressures were estimated using a neural network. Finally, a genetic algorithm is used to search for the optimal well status, lift gas rate, and water injection rate for each well. Connections were made to databases to run the model using field conditions at any time over the last five years. The hydraulic model for three phase flow utilizes a neural network, whereas a simpler linear based model is used for the water injection system. The hydraulic model was rigorously back tested using field data over a two-year period with weekly model retraining. Drillsite header pressures deviated 6 psi on average from actuals, which is on par with commercial software. The optimization converges in under 90 seconds in a single facility optimization run. The recommendations from the optimization program are expected to increase oil rate 1.5% in the existing system. While production optimization using genetic algorithms and neural networks has been presented for over 20 years, there are not many, if any, known industry applications of optimizing the production and injection networks simultaneously using neural network models. The program was written in Python and deployed on cloud computing. The tool is used to calculate daily net oil benefit per well, prioritize shut-in wells when the facility is constrained, and optimize injection pumps and drillsite configurations. Additionally, the model is designed to accept new engineer-specified source wells to understand the impact of backout when developing new projects. Overall, the model has provided a platform for engineers to make optimization decisions in a complex, interdependent system.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».