People's Mediation System Perfection and Reform Under the Multipartite Mediation Mechanism
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Chinese primary level people's system plays very important role in maintaining Chinese society stable, promoting economic society development, and other aspects due to its consistency of autonomy and coordination and convenience in disputes resolving process. However, the traditional people's which is in the transformation period has formed a distinctive and flexible mode by continuous exploration and innovation. This paper analyzes the current N+1 linked-mediation mechanism and its related reform by practically examined the people's reform and system innovation and gives further ideas in improving and perfecting people's system. Key words: Multipartite mediation; People's mediation; System innovation; Mediation concept ZHAO Jingbo (2012). People's Mediation System Perfection and Reform Under the Multipartite Mediation Mechanism. Cross-Cultural Communication, 8(3), 87-91. Available from URL http://www.cscanada. net/index.php/ccc/article/view/j.ccc. 1923670020120803.2940 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120803.2940 1. CHARACTERISTICS OF PEOPLE'S MEDIATION UNDER THE MULTIPARTITE MEDIATION MECHANISM 1.1 Definition of Multipartite Mediation The so called multipartite mediation is a shorten form for social contradiction disputes mediation. It is a diverse resolution mechanism in China instead of a strict legal concept or system. The emergence of is an attempt made by some regions of China in discovering diverse resolution mechanism according to their own social requirement and need which has obvious characteristics of emergency mechanism in the period of social transformation (FAN, 2007, p.561). There are different understandings on the definition or concept of from quite different angles. There is no unified understanding about the in the theoretical field and in practice. Some scholars think that for the ruling party in China, is a mechanism that led by the Chinese communist party (CCP) and the government, coordinated by comprehensive governmental and judicial departments, directed by judicial departments, attended by other departments, interacted via various means and methods, and coordinated with each other to resolve and deal different kinds of disputes. Some think that for court, includes court that can help or assist other departments' and can give effective connection with other mediations. There are also other scholars who think that for judicial departments, is people's based and jointly made by other mediations to resolve contradictions among the people. The Suggestions from the Chinese central politic and law commitee and the central leader group of peace maintanance in Promoting Social Disputes and Contradictions Resolving, Social Management Innovation, and Fair and Clear Enforcement of Law forwarded by the General Office of CCCPC and the General Office of the State Council of China provides: every local and regional level government needs to make full use of political advantages and construct a working system of which the political, legal, comprehensive management, peace maintaining, and petition department work harmoniously, related departments and units play their own roles properly, and people's mediation, administrative mediation, and judicial not only fully show their functions but also work together as a unified system. This is the newest and most authoritative expression of the mediation. The Chinese Communist Party and government are managerial leaders of the working system. Management organs set up by the Party committee and government are governed by the Party committee and government's leaders. Leaders of public security organs and judicial departments and various administrative management organs are responsible for coordinating with the Party committee and government leaders in practicing mediation. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».