MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3100516867 · doi:10.15414/afz.2020.23.mi-fpap.250-257

Evaluation of score for subclinical ketosis risk in Czech Holstein cows

2020· article· en· W3100516867 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eva Kašná

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa fytotechnica et zootechnica/Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnimal scienceKetosisHeritabilityMilkingBiologyLactationIce calvingAnimal breedingMedicineEndocrinologyPregnancyDiabetes mellitus

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Submitted 2020-07-17 | Accepted 2020-08-18 | Available 2020-12-01 https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2020.23.mi-fpap.250-257 This study aimed to evaluate the score for subclinical ketosis risk, which is routinely monitored in Czech Holstein cows. The score is based on milk recording indicator traits which include fat-to-protein ratio, fat-to-lactose ratio, citric acid, β-hydroxybutyrate, and acetone concentrations. The score was significantly (P <0.001) affected by the age of cow at calving, days in milk (DIM) and season of test-day recording. Variance components were estimated with a univariate linear animal model for the score on the first test-day and with a multivariate linear animal model for the score in 3 successive test-days (6-40, 30-70, 60-100 DIM). The heritability estimate was lower at the beginning of lactation (0.08) and increased gradually to 0.11 at the end of the recorded period. Genetic correlations between the score at the first and the other two test-days were lower than 1 indicating that they are genetically different traits. Estimated breeding values were normally distributed with mean 0.20 and reliabilities up to 0.66 in females and 0.98 in males. Breeding values were negatively correlated with most of other routinely evaluated traits, with the strongest correlations with milk fat percentage (0.39), body condition score (-0.26) and fertility of cows (-0.25). The score for subclinical ketosis risk showed sufficient genetic variability and had the potential to be used in genetic improvement of resistance to (sub)clinical ketosis of Czech Holstein cows. Keywords: metabolic status, indicator trait, ketone body References Bastin, C. et al. (2016) On the role of mid-infrared predicted phenotypes in fertility and health dairy breeding programs. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(5), 4080–4094. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10087 Belay, T.K. et al. (2017) Genetic parameters of blood β-hydroxybutyrate predicted from milk infrared spectra and clinical ketosis, and their associations with milk production traits in Norwegian Red cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(8), 6298–6311. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12458 Costa, A. et al. (2019) Genetic association of lactose and its ratios to other milk solids with health traits in Austrian Fleckvieh cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(5), 4238–4248. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15883 Gebreyesus, G. et al. (2020) Predictive ability of host genetics and rumen microbiome for subclinical ketosis. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(5), 4557–4569. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17824 Hanuš, O. et al. (2017) Analyse of relationships between some milk indicators of cow energy metabolism and ketosis state. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(4), 1135–1147. Hanuš O. et al. (2013) Identification of subclinical ketosis in early lactation of cows according to the results of milk yield and individual milk samples in milk recording scheme and interpretation of results. Certified methodology. Prague: Institute of Dairy Science. In Czech. Jamrozik, J. et al. (2016) Multiple-trait estimates of genetic parameters for metabolic disease traits, fertility disorders, and their predictors in Canadian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(3), 1990–1998. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10505 Kašná, E. et al. (2020) Fat-to-protein ratio in milk of Holstein cows. Náš chov, 80(2), 32–36. In Czech. Kašná, E. et al. (2019) Genetic evaluation of reproductive and metabolic disorders and displaced abomasum in Czech Holstein cows. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(4), 939–946. Koeck, A. et al. (2014) Genetic analysis of milk β-hydroxybutyrate and its association with fat-to-protein ratio, body composition score, clinical ketosis, and displaced abomasum in early first lactation of Canadian Holstein. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(11), 7286–7292. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8405 Madsen, P. & Jensen, J. (2013) A User’s Guide to DMU. Retrieved June 25, 2020 from https://dmu.ghpc.au.dk/DMU/Doc/Current/dmuv6_guide.5.2.pdf Martens, H. (2020) Transition period of the dairy cow revisited: I. Homeorhesis and its changes by selection and management. Journal of Agricultural Science, 12(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v12n3pl Pryce, J. E. et al. (2016) Invited review: Opportunities for genetic improvement of metabolic diseases. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(9), 6855–6873. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-10854 SAS Institute Inc. (2017) Base SAS® 9.4 Procedures Guide, Seventh Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. Šlosárková, S. et al. (2016) Monitoring of dairy cattle diseases in the Czech Republic. Veterinářství, 66(11), 859–866. In Czech. Van der Drift, S. G. A. et al. (2012) Genetic and non-genetic variation in plasma and milk β-hydroxybutyrate and milk acetone concentrations of early-lactation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(11), 6781–6787. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5640 Vosman, J. J. et al. (2015) Genetic evaluation for ketosis in the Netherlands based on FTIR measurements. Interbull Bulletin No. 49: Proceedings of the 2015 Interbull Meeting, Orlando, Florida, 1–5.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,355
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0040,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,062
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa fytotechnica et zootechnica/Acta fytotechnica et zootechnicaMême sujetGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockTravaux en français237 207