MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3102950836 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100644

Towards early prediction of Alzheimer's disease through language samples

2020· article· en· W3102950836 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Jed A. Meltzer

Notice bibliographique

RevueEClinicalMedicine · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Établissements canadiensBaycrest HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrimary progressive aphasiaMedicineScopusDiseaseNeuropsychologyAphasiaDementiaNeurodegenerationAlzheimer's diseaseBiomarkerCognitive psychologyMEDLINEPsychologyPathologyPsychiatryCognitionFrontotemporal dementia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Although accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) remains a priority for research, even more research interest currently focuses on the prediction of the disease years or decades before its onset. Because the neurodegeneration caused by the disease is likely irreversible, a better treatment strategy would be to identify those undergoing the early changes linked to eventual disease onset and to administer a mitigating treatment (yet to be developed) at that time. One biomarker of intense interest is naturalistic language samples, as they are easy to acquire, completely noninvasive, and, compared to most neuropsychological assessments, easily repeated on a regular basis without practice effects. However, the analysis is complicated, laborious, and potentially subjective. In recent years, advances in machine learning and natural language processing have been applied to language samples for the detection of dementia, and researchers have achieved considerable success in distinguishing the speech of individuals with and without dementia [1Orimaye S.O. Wong J.S. Golden K.J. Wong C.P. Soyiri I.N Predicting probable Alzheimer's disease using linguistic deficits and biomarkers.BMC Bioinformatics. 2017; 18: 34Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar, 2Fraser K.C. Meltzer J.A. Rudzicz F Linguistic features identify alzheimer's disease in narrative speech.J Alzheimers Dis. 2015; 49: 407-422Crossref Scopus (305) Google Scholar, 3Fraser K.C. Meltzer J.A. Graham N.L. Leonard C. Hirst G. Black S.E. et al.Automated classification of primary progressive aphasia subtypes from narrative speech transcripts.Cortex. 2014; 55: 43-60Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (118) Google Scholar]. Despite these advances, the predictive power of language samples is largely unproven, given that very few studies have been able to examine participants years before an eventual diagnosis of AD, to compare the language output of those who do and do not go on to develop the disease [[4]Snowdon D.A. Kemper S.J. Mortimer J.A. Greiner L.H. Wekstein D.R. Markesbery W.R Linguistic ability in early life and cognitive function and Alzheimer's disease in late life. Findings from the Nun Study.JAMA. 1996; 275: 528-532Crossref PubMed Google Scholar]. A prospective study of this topic would require a very large sample, take many years to complete, and would have a relatively low yield of positive findings for the effort. Fortunately, as the potential value of speech and other cognitive measures as a biomarker has come to increased attention, large-scale prospective studies of health in general have begun to include them in their assessment batteries. As published in EClinicalMedicine, Elif Eyigoz and colleagues present an analysis [[5]Eyigoz E. Mathur S. Santamaria M. Cecchi G. Naylor M Linguistic markers predict onset of Alzheimer's disease.Eclinical Medicine. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100583Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar] of written language samples collected in the Framingham Heart Study (FHS), one of the world's largest and best-known prospective health studies. Founded in 1948, the FHS began to incorporate a neuropsychological test battery in 1999, including a brief written picture description. Critically, in the years since this was introduced, some participants went on to develop dementia while many more did not, allowing a retrospective comparison based on data fortuitously acquired years earlier. Elif Eyigoz et al. applied state of the art analysis procedures to samples from 270 participants finding that dementia onset before age 85 could be identified with 70–75% accuracy. This is well above chance performance, and slightly below the best performance seen in studies comparing current dementia patients with controls [[6]Petti U. Baker S. Korhonen A A systematic literature review of automatic Alzheimer's disease detection from speech and language.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar]. The authors then demonstrate that their model picks up on many of the same linguistic trends seen in previous comparisons of AD vs. controls. This finding is exciting, being among the first to show predictive value of language samples well before the onset of dementia, while its limitations point the way for future work. The accuracy rates of 70–75% are encouraging but not yet satisfactory for a realistic clinical tool, but this is likely to be an inevitable consequence of the limited language samples available. The samples are descriptions of a single picture (“Cookie Theft”), and limited both in length to a few dozen words, and in content to what is shown in the picture. Longer samples covering more extensive topics would surely provide a more sensitive view of linguistic changes. More significantly, the samples are only written. Although written samples have a history of predictive value, speech is a more natural form of communication giving access to several important quantitative variables, especially those related to the ease of word finding, including overall speech rate and pausing [[7]Guo Z. Ling Z. Li Y Detecting alzheimer's disease from continuous speech using language models.J Alzheimers Dis. 2019; 70: 1163-1174Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar]. It remains to be seen how high the predictive accuracy of language samples can be pushed given more extensive data sources, and it is important that such data be collected. The most advanced machine learning algorithms cannot overcome the limitations of sparse input. Fortunately, collection of speech data is simple to implement and simple to include within a larger natural history study like the FHS. A number of longitudinal health studies now include detailed speech measures and can be expected to yield new insights into the earliest stages of the evolution of dementia [[8]Mueller K.D. Koscik R.L. Hermann B.P. Johnson S.C. Turkstra L.S Declines in connected language are associated with very early mild cognitive impairment: results from the wisconsin registry for alzheimer's prevention.Front Aging Neurosci. 2018; 9PubMed Google Scholar,[9]Farhan S.M. Bartha R. Black S.E. Corbett D. Finger E. Freedman M. et al.The ontario neurodegenerative disease research initiative (ONDRI).Can J Neurol Sci. 2017; 44: 196-202Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar]. Above all, this study illustrates the value of open science – a simple measure that was not the original focus of the FHS provided valuable new knowledge when shared with the larger scientific community. Given the complexity and expense of longitudinal studies of dementia, this level of data sharing needs to become the norm. Researchers should take pains to harmonize data collection and archiving procedures, while addressing practical concerns such including consent and privacy (especially with speech, as the human voice is inherently identifiable). Additionally, attention should be paid as to which kinds of speech elicitation tasks provide the most informative samples, as there are many different options, including picture description, story retell (e.g. Cinderella), autobiographical interviews, and dyadic conversation [[10]Boschi V. Catricala E. Consonni M. Chesi C. Moro A. Cappa S.F Connected speech in neurodegenerative language disorders: a review.Front Psychol. 2017; 8: 269Crossref PubMed Scopus (107) Google Scholar]. Dr. Meltzer is a shareholder and advisor of Winterlight Labs. Linguistic markers predict onset of Alzheimer's diseaseThe results suggest that language performance in naturalistic probes expose subtle early signs of progression to AD in advance of clinical diagnosis of impairment. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,157
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,489

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,144
Tête enseignante GPT0,364
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2020
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEClinicalMedicineMême sujetNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismTravaux en français237 207