MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3103248380 · doi:10.15414/afz.2020.23.mi-fpap.58-66

Low doses of lactoferrin supplementation in weaning calves

2020· article· en· W3103248380 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marica Simoni

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa fytotechnica et zootechnica/Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineVeterinary
ThématiqueAnimal health and immunology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésColostrumLactoferrinWeaningAnimal scienceMedicineAntibodyBiologyImmunologyBiochemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Different trials demonstrated lactoferrin (LF) to possess antimicrobial, antiviral, antimycotic and anti-inflammatory activity. This molecule is an iron-binding protein that could have preventive effects on calf diseases. Several authors studied the effects of LF at doses between 1 and 10 g/calf/day as a supplement in milk administrated to weaning calves. The results are variable and not always consistent. Twenty-two female replacement calves divided into 2 groups (Control-C and Treated-LF) during a 56-d experimental period were employed to investigate the effect of the use of 0.1 g/d of LF during weaning on growth performances, feed efficiency and health status. The field trial was conducted employing an early weaning protocol (49-d of length, excluding the colostral phase). After parturition, density and immunoglobulin G (IgG) content of dam colostrum were measured as a colostrum quality indicator. Only colostrum with at least 50 mg/mL of IgG was bottle-fed to the calf. Morphometric measurements and feedstuff intake were recorded weekly. Health status and milk consumption were evaluated daily. Calves receiving low doses of LF had numerically less incidence of diarrhoea than the C group (P > 0.05). From a statistical point of view, any significant difference was observed between groups both on growth performances and feed efficiency. A trend for an increase of the FCR was found for LF group at weaning (P = 0.099). More researches are needed to define the optimal dose and the real action of LF in weaning calves. Keywords: calf, lactoferrin, pre-weaned, performances, health status References Abdel fattah, A., Mohammed, H., Youssef, M., Saleem, A.-S., & Youniss, I. (2019). Assessment the Calf’s Welfare Due to The Gender, Number of Offspring and Calving Status in Holstein Calves. SVU-International Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.21608/svu.2019.6656.1002 Bartier, A. L., Windeyer, M. C., & Doepel, L. (2015). Evaluation of on-farm tools for colostrum quality measurement. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(3), 1878–1884. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8415 Bielmann, V., Gillan, J., Perkins, N. R., Skidmore, A. L., Godden, S., & Leslie, K. E. (2010). An evaluation of Brix refractometry instruments for measurement of colostrum quality in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(8), 3713–3721. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2943 Cho, Y. il, & Yoon, K. J. (2014). An overview of calf diarrhea - infectious etiology, diagnosis, and intervention. Journal of Veterinary Science, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2014.15.1.1 Comino, L., Tabacco, E., Righi, F., Revello-Chion, A., Quarantelli, A., & Borreani, G. (2014). Effects of an inoculant containing a Lactobacillus buchneri that produces ferulate-esterase on fermentation products, aerobic stability, and fibre digestibility of maize silage harvested at different stages of maturity. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 198, 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.10.001 Cowles, K. E., White, R. A., Whitehouse, N. L., & Erickson, P. S. (2006). Growth characteristics of calves fed an intensified milk replacer regimen with additional lactoferrin. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(12), 4835–4845. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72532-2 English, E. A., Hopkins, B. A., Stroud, J. S., Davidson, S., Smith, G., Brownie, C., & Whitlow, L. W. (2007). Lactoferrin supplementation to holstein calves during the preweaning and postweaning phases. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(11), 5276–5281. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0361 García-Montoya, I. A., Cendón, T. S., Arévalo-Gallegos, S., & Rascón-Cruz, Q. (2012). Lactoferrin a multiple bioactive protein: An overview. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - General Subjects, 1820(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.06.018 Godden, S. (2008). Colostrum Management for Dairy Calves. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice, 24(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2007.10.005 Habing, G., Harris, K., Schuenemann, G. M., Piñeiro, J. M., Lakritz, J., & Clavijo, X. A. (2017). Lactoferrin reduces mortality in preweaned calves with diarrhea. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(5), 3940–3948. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11969 Heinrichs, A. J., Jones, C. M., Erickson, P. S., Chester-Jones, H., & Anderson, J. L. (2020). Symposium review: Colostrum management and calf nutrition for profitable and sustainable dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(6), 5694–5699. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17408 Jamrozik, J., & Miller, S. P. (2014). Genetic evaluation of calving ease in Canadian Simmentals using birth weight and gestation length as correlated traits. Livestock Science, 162(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.01.027 Joslin, R. S., Erickson, P. S., Santoro, H. M., Whitehouse, N. L., Schwab, C. G., & Rejman, J. J. (2002). Lactoferrin supplementation to dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 85(5), 1237–1242. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74187-8 Legrand, D., Pierce, A., Elass, E., Carpentier, M., Mariller, C., & Mazurier, J. (2008). Lactoferrin structure and functions. In Bioactive components of milk (pp. 163–194). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018076 Lokke, M. M., Engelbrecht, R., & Wiking, L. (2016). Covariance structures of fat and protein influence the estimation of IgG in bovine colostrum. Journal of Dairy Research, 83(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029915000734 Maunsell, F., & Donovan, G. A. (2008). Biosecurity and Risk Management for Dairy Replacements. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice, 24(1), 155–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2007.10.007 Mechor, G. D., Gröhn, Y. T., McDowell, L. R., & Van Saun, R. J. (1992). Specific Gravity of Bovine Colostrum Immunoglobulins as Affected by Temperature and Colostrum Components. Journal of Dairy Science, 75(11), 3131–3135. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78076-X Morrill, K. M., Conrad, E., Lago, A., Campbell, J., Quigley, J., & Tyler, H. (2012). Nationwide evaluation of quality and composition of colostrum on dairy farms in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(7), 3997–4005. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5174 NRC. (2001). Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Research Council. (N. A. Press, Ed.) (Nutrition,). National Academies. Pan, Y., Rowney, M., Guo, P., & Hobman, P. (2007). Biological properties of lactoferrin: An overview. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology, 62(1), 31–42. Pempek, J. A., Holder, E., Proudfoot, K. L., Masterson, M., & Habing, G. (2018). Short communication: Investigation of antibiotic alternatives to improve health and growth of veal calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(5), 4473–4478. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14055 Prenner, M. L., Prgomet, C., Sauerwein, H., Pfaffl, M. W., Broz, J., & Schwarz, F. J. (2007). Effects of lactoferrin feeding on growth, feed intake and health of calves. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 61(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390600973675 Righi, F., Simoni, M., Foskolos, A., Beretti, V., Sabbioni, A., & Quarantelli, A. (2017). In vitro ruminal dry matter and neutral detergent fibre digestibility of common feedstuffs as affected by the addition of essential oils and their active compounds. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 26(3), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/76754/2017 Righi, F., Simoni, M., Malacarne, M., Summer, A., Costantini, E., & Quarantelli, A. (2016). Feeding a free choice energetic mineral-vitamin supplement to dry and transition cows: Effects on health and early lactation performance. Large Animal Review, 22(4), 161–170. Robblee, E. D., Erickson, P. S., Whitehouse, N. L., McLaughlin, A. M., Schwab, C. G., Rejman, J. J., & Rompala, R. E. (2003). Supplemental lactoferrin improves health and growth of holstein calves during the preweaning phase. Journal of Dairy Science, 86(4), 1458–1464. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73729-1 Shah, A. M., Shah, A. R., Hassan, M. F., Yousif, M., & Wang, Z. (2019). Colostrum composition and its importance to the health ofanimals - A review. Punjab University Journal of Zoology, 34(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pujz/2019.34.2.197.206 Simoni, M., Temmar, R., Bignamini, D. A., Foskolos, A., Sabbioni, A., Ablondi, M., Quarantelli, A., & Righi, F.(2020). Effects of the combination between selected phytochemicals and the carriers silica and Tween 80 ondry matter and neutral detergent fibre digestibility of common feeds. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 19(1), 723-738.https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1787882 Superti, F., Ammendolia, M. G., Valenti, P., & Seganti, L. (1997). Antirotaviral activity of milk proteins:Lactoferrin prevents rotavirus infection in the enterocyte like cell line HT-29. Medical Microbiology and Immunology, 186(2–3), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004300050049 Svensson, C., Lundborg, K., Emanuelson, U., & Olsson, S. O. (2003). Morbidity in Swedish dairy calves from birth to 90 days of age and individual calf-level risk factors for infectious diseases. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 58(3–4), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(03)00046-1 Taha, N., El barbary, H., Ibrahim, E., Mohammed, H., & Wahba, N. (2019). Application of lactoferrin as a trial to control E.Coli O1and O26 in pasteurized milk. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal, 36(2), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.21608/bvmj.2019.15172.1054 Teraguchi, S., Shin, K., Fukuwatari, Y., & Shimamura, S. (1996). Glycans of bovine lactoferrin function as receptors for the type 1 fimbrial lectin of Escherichia coli. Infection and Immunity, 64(3), 1075–1077. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.64.3.1075-1077.1996 Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2  Â

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,598
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0050,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,072
Tête enseignante GPT0,369
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa fytotechnica et zootechnica/Acta fytotechnica et zootechnicaMême sujetAnimal health and immunologyTravaux en français237 207