Results on stellar occultations by (307261) 2002 MS4
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AbstractTransneptunian Objects (TNOs) are the remnants of our planetary system and can retain information about the early stages of the Solar System formation. Stellar occultation is a ground-based method used to study these distant bodies which have been presenting exciting results mainly about their physical properties. The big TNO called 2002 MS4 was discovered by Trujillo, C. A., & Brown, M. E., in 2002 using observations made at the Palomar Observatory (EUA). It is classified as a hot classical TNO, with orbital parameters a = 42 AU, e = 0.139, and i = 17.7º. Using thermal measurements with PACS (Herschel) and MIPS (Spitzer Space Telescope) instruments, Vilenius et al. 2012 obtained a radius of 467 +/- 23.5 km and an albedo of 0.051.Predictions of stellar occultations by this body in 2019 were obtained using the Gaia DR2 catalogue and NIMA ephemeris (Desmars et al. 2015) and made available in the Lucky Star web page (https://lesia.obspm.fr/lucky-star/). Four events were observed in South America and Canada. The first stellar occultation was detected on 09 July 2019, resulting in two positives and four negatives chords, including a close one which proven to be helpful to constrain the body’s size. This detection also allowed us to obtain a precise astrometric position that was used to update its ephemeris and improve the predictions of the following events. Two of them were detected on 26 July 2019, separated by eight hours. The first event was observed from South America and resulted in three positive detections, while the second, observed from Canada, resulted in a single chord. Another double chord event was observed on 19 August 2019 also from Canada.Due to its size, it is expected that 2002 MS4 is in hydrostatic equilibrium. Thirouin, A. 2013 obtained a rotational light curve of 2002 MS4 and determined two possible periods (7.33 h and 10.44 h) with low amplitude variation (0.05 +/- 0.01 mag). Admitting that it has a Maclaurin shape, the projected limb in the sky plane for Earth-based observers should be the same in the 09 July and 26 July events. The multi-chord detection allows determining an interval of parameters for size and shape. Considering that the same figure should have been observed in the 09 July event, we could use the both chords and the negative observations to constrain its physical parameters. With that, we could determine that 2002 MS4 has an equivalent radius of 385 +/- 1 km (Figure 1). Our results indicate that this TNO is about 100 km smaller in diameter than the value obtained by Vilenius et al. 2012, implying an albedo of 0.076 (Hv = 4.0 +/- 0.6) . The astrometric positions derived from these data were also helpful to improve forthcoming stellar occultations, in special the one crossing Europe on 08 August this year. More data from stellar occultations and observations of rotational light curves will help to confirm these results and assumptions.Acknowledgements: F.L.R is thankful for the support of the CAPES scholarship. The following authors acknowledge the respective CNPq grants: F.B-R 309578/2017-5; R.V-M 304544/2017-5, 401903/2016-8; J.I.B.C. 308150/2016-3; M.A 427700/2018-3, 310683/2017-3, 473002/2013-2. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001 and the National Institute of Science and Technology of the e-Universe project (INCT do e-Universo, CNPq grant 465376/2014-2). G.B-R acknowledges CAPES-FAPERJ/PAPDRJ grant E26/203.173/2016, M.A FAPERJ grant E-26/111.488/2013 and A.R.G-Jr FAPESP grant 2018/11239-8. B.E.M thanks the CAPES/Cofecub-394/2016-05 grant. P.S-S. acknowledges financial support by the Spanish grant AYA-RTI2018-098657-J-I00 "LEO-SBNAF" (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE). We would like to acknowledge financial support from the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the “Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa” award for the Instituto de Astrofı́sica de Andalucı́a (SEV-2017-0709) and the financial support by the Spanish grant AYA-2017-84637-R. Part of the results were based on observations taken at the 1.6 m telescope on Pico dos Dias Observatory of the National Laboratory of Astrophysics (LNA/Brazil). Part of this work was carried out within the “Lucky Star" umbrella that agglomerates the efforts of the Paris, Granada and Rio teams. It is funded by the European Research Council under the European Community’s H2020 (2014-2020/ERC Grant Agreement No. 669416). This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement. ReferencesAssafin, M. et al. PRAIA - Platform for Reduction of Astronomical Images Automatically. In: Tanga, P.; Thuillot, W. (Ed.). Gaia follow-up network for the solar system objects : Gaia FUN-SSO workshop proceedings, held at IMCCE -Paris Observatory, France, November 29 - December 1, 2010 / edited by Paolo Tanga, William Thuillot.- ISBN 2-910015-63-7, p. 85-88. [S.l.: s.n.], 2011. p. 85–88.Desmars, J. et al. Orbit determination of trans-Neptunian objects and Centaurs for the prediction of stellar occultations. Astronomy & Astrophysics, v. 584, p. A96, dez. 2015.Thirouin, A. Study of Trans-Neptunian Objects using photometric techniques and numerical simulations. Dissertation. Editorial de la Universidad de Granada. Spain, 2013.Trujillo, C. A., Brown, M. E., Minor Planet Electronic Circulars – MPEC 2002-W27. Disponível em: \url{https://minorplanetcenter.net//iau/mpec/K02/K02W27.html}.Vilenius, E. “TNOs are cool”: a survey of the trans-Neptunian region. VI. Herschel/PACS observations and thermal modelling of 19 classical Kuiper belt objects. Astronomy & Astrophysics. v. 541, A94, 2012.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».