MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W310582504

Picturing Dunbar's Lyrics

2007· article· en· W310582504 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ray Sapirstein

Notice bibliographique

RevueAfrican American Review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryStanzaLyricsPhotographyLiteratureHistoryArtTone (literature)Art historyVisual arts
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

From 1899 until shortly after his death in 1906, Paul Laurence Dunbar published six books of poetry in African American dialect, patterned ornately with Art Nouveau decoration, and illustrated extensively with photographs, positioning text and images with nearly equivalent emphasis. (1) Comprising half Dunbar's output of published poetry, and among his most popular volumes, the illustrated editions demonstrate Dunbar's substantial interaction with photography, and represent an early, extensive, and influential use of text published with photographs. Dunbar's Poems of Cabin and Field (1899), Candle Lightin' Time (1901), When Malindy Sings (1903), L'il Gal (1904), Howdy, Honey, Howdy (1905), and Joggin' Erlong (1906), all published by Dodd, Mead and Company, remain defining monuments of text and image in the history of African American letters and US publishing. Made possible only by the refinement of half-tone printing in the 1890s, the Dunbar books positioned text and photographs on the same page, one image per stanza, an established formula for the illustrated poetry of the day. (2) The photo books made a more substantial contribution to Dunbar's lifework and to US cultural history than scholars have estimated previously. The first two books in the series, Poems of Cabin and Field and Candle Lightin' Time, were published in five and four US editions of 5000, respectively, and several of the books were published additionally in English and Canadian editions (Martin and Hudson 21). (3) During his lifetime, many Americans would have read Dunbar's work in this form, and perhaps with the exception of the Farm Security Administration, the more than 450 total images that appear in the Dunbar books represent the largest body of photographs of African Americans published to date, a major unexplored resource in the history of American visual culture and African American studies. In addition to formal innovations anticipating cinematic montage, the Dunbar photo-texts add significantly to a limited canon of artistic images of African Americans, and clarify the poet's own iconography and range, frequently articulating tropes in Dunbar's work that remain latent suggestions in their purely textual form. Although the Dunbar books did not necessarily pioneer the photograph-and-poetry form, several later African American writers and/or photographers--among them, Langston Hughes, Roy de Carava, Gordon Parks, Richard Wright, and Walter Dean Myers--collaborated to produce illustrated books of poetry, making the form a lasting convention in African American letters, implicitly paying homage to Dunbar's foundational works in the genre. (4) Throughout the publication run of the books, the photographic illustrations were made by the predominantly white faculty and staff members of the Institute Camera Club; most hailed from New England and other areas of the Northeast. Citing Germanic art photography and the historic Pamunkey Indian name for the peninsula on which the school was located, the club was known internally, and presumably satirically, as the Kiquotan Kamera Klub. In the first three published books, the photographs were credited to the Hampton Institute Camera Club, to maintain the school's profile in the public eye, and evidently to suggest the poet's close connection to the school. An accomplished and judicious club member who emerged as the lead photographer, Leigh Richmond Miner illustrated the final three books individually. The Camera Club operated from 1893-1926, and folded a few years after Hampton's faculty was integrated in 1923. Including spouses, the Camera Club had only seven identifiable African American members throughout its history, although determining racial identity through textual documents is fraught with uncertainty; others may yet be identified. No Indians seem to have been members of the club, although substantial numbers attended the school through 1912. No students of either race were members of the club, and it does not appear that photography was taught as a trade or skill until later in the schools history. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,053
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,178

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0530,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAfrican American ReviewMême sujetLiterature, Film, and Journalism AnalysisTravaux en français237 207