Metamorphism of the Flin Flon greenstone belt, Manitoba
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Flin Flon greenstone belt (FFB), part of the Paleoproterozoic Trans-Hudson Orogen, comprises metamorphosed volcanic, plutonic and sedimentary rocks. The FFB is exposed in west-central Manitoba and east-central Saskatchewan north of the approximately EW-trending unconformity with overlying Paleozoic sedimentary strata but continues beneath these strata to the south. Two phases of metamorphism are recorded in the FFB. The first consists of contact metamorphism resulting from the intrusion of plutons between 1.87–1.83 Ga; the second is a regional event interpreted to have been caused by the collision of accreted terranes with the Superior craton at 1.83–1.80 Ga. Regional metamorphic grade in the exposed FFB increases to the north from prehnite-pumpellyite facies to upper amphibolite facies. Nine isograds were defined for metavolcanic rocks (actinolite-in, prehnite and pumpellyite-out, biotite-in, hornblende-in, oligoclase-in, actinolite-out, chlorite-out, garnet-in and epidote-out) and six for metasedimentary rocks (garnet-in, staurolite-in, andalusite-in, sillimanite-in, staurolite-out and migmatite-in). South of the exposed FFB, grade increases from greenschist to amphibolite facies. Five areas of the exposed FFB with different metamorphic characteristics have been defined, from west to east: (1) the Flin Flon area contains metavolcanics ranging from prehnite-pumpellyite to amphibolite facies, in which garnet-in occurs upgrade of epidote-out; (2) the Cranberry-Iskwasum-Elbow Lake area is a large domain of greenschist facies rocks; (3) the File Lake-Reed Lake area contains adjacent domains of metavolcanics and low-K metasediments with well-defined isograd sequences ranging from upper-greenschist to upper-amphibolite facies. In the metavolcanics, the epidote-out isograd occurs upgrade of garnet-in, whereas in metasediments, all of the isograds (garnet-in through migmatite-in) occur in the amphibolite or upper amphibolite facies, and sillimanite is the only Al2SiO5 mineral observed; (4) the Snow Lake area contains a similar sequence of isograds to the File Lake-Reed Lake area, but develops kyanite in altered rocks associated with the ore deposits in the area; and (5) the Niblock Lake-Saw Lake area consists of metasediments and contains a sequence of isograds with andalusite and sillimanite. The observed metamorphic sequences were used to test the predictions of thermodynamically-calculated phase diagrams. The main discrepancies for metabasites are: (1) the wider observed domains of coexisting amphiboles and feldspars compared to the narrow predicted intervals, an effect ascribed primarily to metastable persistence of the lower grade minerals; and (2) the inability of the phase diagrams to predict the development of garnet. The main discrepancy for the low-K metasediments is the incongruence between the observed and predicted occurrence of muscovite and chlorite in the sequence, a problem exacerbated by the difficulty of identifying whether the minerals in the rocks are primary or secondary. Despite these incongruities, the agreement between the observed and predicted phase relations is sufficient to allow assessment of pressure-temperature conditions and metamorphic field gradients of the FFB. In the western FFB (Area 1), the prehnite- and pumpellyite-out isograds occurred at conditions of 250-300°C and 2.3-3.2 kbar, whereas the hornblende-in and actinolite-out isograds developed at 430-460°C and 2.7-4.2 kbar. In the central-eastern FFB (Areas 3 and 4), the hornblende-in and actinolite-out isograds in metabasites developed at 440-450°C and 3.5-4.0 kbar, whereas the sillimanite-in/staurolite-out isograds in metasediments developed at 570-640°C and 4.5-6.5 kbar. In the easternmost FFB (Area 5), the andalusite-sillimanite sequence developed at 550-600°C and 3-3.5 kbar. The resulting metamorphic field gradients range from 100°C/kbar to 150°C/kbar for all areas of the FFB.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».