Female Genital Cutting and African Women's Migration to Canada: Toward a Postcolonial Feminist Decolonizing Methodology
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The discourse on the cultural practice of FGC has captured a lot of attention over the last several decades, and with international migration propelling what was once a private cultural practice onto the global stage, FGC has become a fixture in the international human rights and global health arenas. FGC is a sensitive topic and the debates around it remain politically and culturally contentious. A lot of resources have been poured into eradication endeavors with multiple multinational organizations including the WHO spearheading the effort, the non-negotiable endpoint being the wellbeing, safety, and security of young girls and women. The purpose of this qualitative interpretive description study informed by decolonizing perspectives was to critically examine how immigrant and refugee women who have experienced FGC make sense of and explain the practice for themselves and for younger generations; and to explore the sociopolitical contexts sustaining and perpetuating FGC in the lives of affected younger and older women including their perceptions of as well as interactions with health services in diasporic locations. Participants’ understandings and agency-in-practice were analyzed through the themes of Experiencing, Explaining, Migrating, and Mitigating FGC. A decolonizing interpretation of research findings surfaced the intersections of social, political, economic, and cultural barriers manifesting through racialized and gendered axes of exclusion and marginalization to affect the health and wellbeing of FGC-affected immigrant and refugee women in a globalized milieu. This study highlights the importance of historical and cultural contexts in understanding and researching FGC-affected women as well as the relevance of decolonizing universal norms including in research, in order to effectively do this. This study offers an alternative way of conceptualizing FGC in a transnational setting and has implications for nursing research, health services, nursing education, as well as leadership and policy. Immigrant and refugee women affected by FGC deserve equitable, socially just, culturally responsive, and trauma-informed health services. This is in keeping with the nursing mandate of fostering health equity and social justice for all individuals. This study opens avenues for considering alternative ways of conceptualizing FGC and in doing so lives up to the interpretive description design logic.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».