Education Tools for Mitigating Human-Wildlife Conflict in Urban Areas
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This major project report represents a substantive effort to create educational tools and opportunities for a wide range of audiences in hopes that an increase in ecological knowledge will help reduce instances of human-wildlife conflict in urban areas. By increasing ecological knowledge, the hope is to inspire a greater sense of awareness and care for the wild animals with which we co-occupy space. Toronto Wildlife Centre is a registered charity and a designated wildlife rehabilitation and rescue centre, offering care to sick, injured and orphaned wildlife found by members of the public. Working collaboratively with Toronto Wildlife Centre has allowed me to gain a nuanced understanding of human-wildlife conflicts in urban areas and contribute meaningfully to their educational programs. This Major Project comprises a suite of tools with which to provide education surrounding human-wildlife conflict in urban areas to a wide range of people. The Bounce Back Fact Sheets are for members of the public who find themselves in the midst of human-wildlife conflict. The educational blog posts are for people who are interested in learning more about urban wildlife. Finally, the high school presentations are aimed at promoting a wider appreciation of wildlife, an understanding of human-wildlife conflict in urban areas and steps we can take in our communities to move towards a human-wildlife coexistence. Each presentation will include how they meet curriculum requirements, allowing for teachers to integrate wildlife education and community partnership, whilst operating within the parameters of the curriculum. These educational tools address the need for pre-emptive education as well as offer education to those who have already found themselves in a conflicting situation with wildlife. The topics covered in the blog posts offer ecological knowledge about local Ontario species, what can be expected from them, and how we can help them succeed in urban environments. Topics covered are seasonally appropriate and are aimed at providing a resource for people who wish to learn more about wildlife or as a reference when facing situations such as a turtle crossing a roadway or discovering a bird nest. This Major Project represents a multi-faceted approach to scientific outreach. The objective of this work was to raise awareness of urban wildlife and the difficulties they face to promote sustainable coexistence of humans and non-human animals in an increasingly urbanized world.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».