Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Central MessageSuccessful innovation exemplifies an understanding of 3D anatomy. This application is a novel means to implant larger valves, but it comes with a concern of coronary movement that must be recognized.See Article page 13. Successful innovation exemplifies an understanding of 3D anatomy. This application is a novel means to implant larger valves, but it comes with a concern of coronary movement that must be recognized. See Article page 13. In this technical treatise, Yang1Yang B. A novel simple technique to enlarge the aortic annulus by two valve sizes.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 5: 13-16Google Scholar has provided us a detailed description of his novel approach to manage patients with small aortic roots undergoing aortic valve replacement. Whereas some surgeons dismiss the concerns of implanting small valves in this situation with the potential of patient–prosthesis mismatch, most of us avoid this complication by using some form of root enlargement, such as Nicks or Manouguian procedures or by consideration of a modified Bentall as an alternative. Yang has clearly described the sequential steps to support this approach such that a practicing, experienced surgeon could attempt this safely. It is not clear to this reviewer that the annulus is actually enlarged with this approach. The proposed incision is an inverted “T,” and the patch is essentially tailored such that its width (after suturing) is the same measure as the horizontal portion of the “T” shown in the central picture. In the Nicks procedure, the incision and subsequent placement of the patch actually increases this horizontal measure, explaining the mechanism for true enlargement. Regardless, Yang's strategy appears to work; I suspect that it allows the operator to safely tilt the valve when suturing in the region of the commissure between the left and the noncoronary. The advantage of the approach is that it allows insertion of a larger valve without compromise of the left coronary ostium, arguably by modest tilting of the valve. This alignment is enabled by the mandatory 90-degree clockwise rotation of the left coronary ostium. The surgeon must be aware of the arc of rotation of the coronary and recognize the potential risk, particularly if there is some degree of calcification of the left main, in which case rotation without sufficient mobilization could be accompanied by lumen compromise. As more and more straightforward aortic valves with normal preoperative annulus get gobbled up by the transaortic valve replacement train, the relative proportion of patients with small annuli will continue to increase and we will see more of these patients. Yang's strategy offers another arrow to our strategic quiver. Its use should be cautiously encouraged with the caveat that we must fully understand the root and coronary manipulations that accompany this technique. I hope to see collaboration with his radiology colleagues to better delineate the anatomic changes that ensue from this strategy, particularly if any of these patients go down the path of valve-in-valve transaortic valve replacement procedures in the future. A novel simple technique to enlarge the aortic annulus by two valve sizesJTCVS TechniquesVol. 5PreviewThe current techniques of aortic root enlargement used by adult cardiac surgeons are the Nicks1 and Manouguian procedures.2 The Nicks procedure generally increases aortic annulus by one valve size.1 The Manouguian requires incising the mitral valve (MV) anterior leaflet and left atrium (LA), with risk of mitral regurgitation.3 Reported herein is a new surgical technique to enlarge the aortic annulus by 2 valve sizes without violating the LA or MV. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».