Fever in a lung transplant recipient
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 36-year-old woman presented to the emergency department in June 2019 after experiencing high fevers, chills, nausea, decreased oral intake, and diarrhea for 4 days.Her medical history included cystic fi brosis with resultant exocrine insuffi ciency, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.In addition, she had received a double lung transplant 9 years earlier, for which she was on a long-term immunosuppressive regimen.The donor had been positive for cytomegalovirus (CMV), whereas the patient had been negative for both CMV and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).The EBV status of her donor was unavailable.However, the patient's EBV serology was negative when tested 6 months before this presentation, and she was also known to be negative for both hepatitis B and hepatitis C.She also had a history of stage 3a proteinuric chronic kidney disease with a baseline serum creatinine level of 1.2 mg/dL, hypertension, and an episode of acute transplant rejection in 2014, which resolved with conservative treatment with glucocorticoids.Her home medications were azathioprine, calcium carbonate, cholecalciferol, ferrous sulfate, insulin neutral protamine Hagedorn, insulin aspart with meals, labetalol, a daily multivitamin, prednisone, tacrolimus, ranitidine, and pancreatic enzyme replacement with meals.She was a lifelong nonsmoker with little alcohol intake, and she said she does not use illicit drugs.She had no recent sick contacts, though she had been hospitalized 4 months earlier for Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia, from which she had fully recovered. ■ INITIAL EVALUATION Physical examinationOn presentation to the emergency department, she was normotensive, febrile with a temperature of 39.5°C (103.1°F), and tachycardic with a heart rate of 133 beats per minute.Jugular venous pulsation was visible 1 cm above the sternal angle, and respiratory examination revealed fi ne crackles in the right upper lobe.There was a soft systolic ejection murmur, grade 2 on a scale of 6, heard best at the right upper sternal border.Her abdomen was nontender on palpation, but her liver could be felt 3 cm below the right costal margin and the spleen at 7 cm below the left costal margin.Palpation of the head and neck revealed small diffuse lymphadenopathy.The patient also had prominent right axillary and inguinal lymphadenopathy. Initial investigationsOn initial testing (Table 1), her serum sodium concentration was 131 mmol/L and her potassium level was 5.6 mmol/L.Her creatinine level was 2.5 mg/dL, up from a baseline of 1.24 mg/dL, consistent with an "acute-on-chronic" kidney injury.She had elevated liver enzymes and bilirubin, as well as neutropenia with an absolute neutrophil count of 0.57 × 10 9 /L.Urinalysis was negative for nitrites, leukocytes, glucose, bilirubin, and protein, with a nonactive sediment on microscopy.Liver enzyme analysis revealed the following levels: aspartate aminotransferase 43 U/L, alanine aminotransferase 33 U/L, lactate dehydrogenase 563 U/L, gamma-glutamyl transferase 342 U/L, and alkaline phosphatase 888 U/L.Ferritin was elevated at 1,983 ng/mL (normal 20-200 ng/mL), and her nonfasting
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».