MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3108946720 · doi:10.1002/uog.23562

Validation of upsilon (Y) zone as pathognomonic ultrasound landmark for chorionicity and amnionicity in triplet pregnancy at any gestational age

2020· letter· en· W3108946720 sur OpenAlexaff
Vasilica Stratulat, Nir Melamed, Jon Barrett, Ori Nevo, Kalesha Hack, Stefania Ronzoni

Notice bibliographique

RevueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2020
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Établissements canadiensHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePregnancyObstetricsGestational ageGestationUltrasoundGynecologyPathognomonicRadiologyPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Triplet pregnancy is the most common type of high-order multiple gestation, most often occurring after infertility therapy1. Although the number of transferred embryos is generally limited, splitting of one embryo into two may result in multiple pregnancy which is further complicated by monochorionic placentation2, 3. Chorioamnionicity has a significant impact on fetal risk and neonatal outcome in twins and even more so in triplets3, 4. Ultrasound is the key diagnostic tool to determine chorioamnionicity in multiple pregnancy. Although no specific guidelines are available for high-order multiple pregnancies4, it is common practice to determine chorioamnionicity by counting the number of placentae and amniotic sacs and assessing the thickness of the dividing membranes as early as possible in pregnancy, using high-resolution transvaginal ultrasonography5. In 1996, Sepulveda et al. identified for the first time, in 28 triplet pregnancies, a specific ultrasound landmark called the ‘upsilon zone’, which is the junction of the three interfetal membranes, and demonstrated that it is a useful tool for predicting chorioamnionicity in triplet pregnancies, particularly in the first trimester6. We aimed to investigate if the upsilon zone is easily identifiable at any gestational age and to determine its accuracy in establishing chorionicity and amnionicity in triplets using placental histology as reference. We included retrospectively all triplet pregnancies that underwent ultrasound assessment (using a GE Voluson E8 or E10 (GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) or Philips IU22 (Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) ultrasound system) in our tertiary center between 2013 and 2018. All scans and videoclips from 8 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation were reviewed independently by two observers who were blinded to the final ultrasound report and histopathology results. For each scan, each observer was requested to identify the upsilon zone, defined as the intersection of the three amniotic sacs, and to determine the chorioamnionicity based on the appearance and thickness of the three interfetal membranes at their intersection site (Figure 1). Chorioamnionicity was confirmed by the placental pathology report which was obtained in all pregnancies delivered in our institution. A total of 55 triplet pregnancies were analyzed (Figure S1). Table 1 shows their baseline characteristics. The upsilon zone was identified in 608/638 (95.3%) scans, with an interobserver agreement of 100%. Based on the upsilon zone, 67.3% (37/55) of pregnancies were classified as trichorionic triamniotic, 25.5% (14/55) as dichorionic triamniotic and 1.8% (1/55) as monochorionic triamniotic. In 5.5% (3/55) of pregnancies, the upsilon zone could not be identified, hence, they were classified as dichorionic diamniotic. In 82.7% (43/52) of cases, placental histology was available and was compared with the observers' results. The sensitivity of the upsilon zone in determining chorioamnionicity was 100% (95% CI, 99.0–100%) from 8 + 0 to 27 + 6 weeks and 96.5% (95% CI, 93.3–98.5%) from 28 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the upsilon zone were 98.3% (95% CI, 96.9–99.2%) and 100% (95% CI, 80.5–100%), respectively, with an accuracy of 98.3% (95% CI, 97.0–99.2%) (Table S1). This study confirms that the upsilon zone can be identified at any gestational age and that it is an accurate landmark to determine the chorionicity and amnionicity of triplet pregnancies. The strong correlation of the upsilon zone with placental histology was shown for the first time in a large series of triplet pregnancies. The upsilon zone can be identified by retrospective review of ultrasound images, thus, it could be a valuable tool in the not uncommon event of a late referral of a triplet pregnancy to a tertiary center due to delayed diagnosis or complications. The intersection of the intertwin membranes should also be evaluated during routine assessment of the amniotic fluid volume in the sacs as well as during invasive fetal procedures, such as amniocentesis, selective fetal reduction or laser coagulation for twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Additionally, with the advanced ultrasound technology currently available, the upsilon zone can be easily explored using a three-dimensional (3D) approach. The application of 3D techniques and postprocessing of ultrasound volumes acquired at the level of the intersection of the membranes has not been investigated yet in triplet pregnancy and should be considered in future studies (Figure S2). Professionals performing obstetric ultrasound should be familiar with the upsilon zone and presence of this sign should be assessed in all triplet pregnancies as standard practice. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request Figure S1 Description of study population. Figure S2 3D reconstruction of upsilon zone in trichorionic triamniotic pregnancy at 9 weeks' gestation. Table S1 Diagnostic accuracy of upsilon zone using placental histology as reference, overall and according to gestational age Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,040
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,276
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,040
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyMême sujetAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyTravaux en français237 207