MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3109327763 · doi:10.1111/cobi.13672

Disrupted ecosystem and human phenology at the climate frontline in Gwich'in First Nation territory

2020· article· en· W3109327763 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Tracey A. Proverbs, Abraham R. Stewart, Alice Vittrekwa, Ernest Vittrekwa, Rachel A. Hovel, Emma E. Hodgson

Notice bibliographique

RevueConservation Biology · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensFisheries and Oceans CanadaSimon Fraser University
Organismes subventionnairesLiber Ero FoundationGwich'in Renewable Resources Board
Mots-clésPhenologyEcosystemGeographyClimate changeEcologyEnvironmental resource managementForestryEnvironmental scienceBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In the Arctic, the dynamic nature of climate change is directly affecting ecosystems and human communities (Bush & Lemmen 2019). Climatic changes are often reported as regional trends, but impacts differ between and within ecosystems and are ultimately experienced locally (Byg & Salick 2009). Additionally, directional trends in environmental conditions do not fully represent impacts because increased variability within and across years may also drive significant change. We considered multiple changes occurring in the Gwich'in Settlement Area (GSA) in northwestern Canada to highlight how Arctic residents are dealing with global change at local scales and why local experiences are relevant to global audiences. We are a group of Gwich'in First Nation land users and researchers collaborating on a community-based monitoring program and other research related to an important subsistence fish in the Mackenzie River watershed: łuk dagaii (broad whitefish [Coregonus nasus]) (Hovel et al. 2020; Proverbs et al. 2020). The ongoing monitoring program is a partnership between Gwich'in community members, the Gwich'in Renewable Resources Board (www.grrb.nt.ca), community Renewable Resource Councils, and academic researchers. Authors A.S., A.V., and E.V. are Gwich'in land users involved in the monitoring program. They sample a subset of their subsistence harvest to document information about łuk dagaii populations (Hovel et al. 2020; Hodgson et al. 2020). In our experience, identifying local impacts of environmental change is key to understanding their varied effects and developing adaptive strategies. Indigenous people around the world are intricately connected to the ecosystems where they live and hold deep knowledge of seasonal changes in biological and environmental conditions. This traditional knowledge (TK) is passed through generations and informs historical and present-day land use (Turner et al. 2000; Eira et al. 2018). Like other Indigenous people, the ancestors of A.S., A.V., and E.V. monitored the land, noting patterns and unusual events (Gill et al. 2014). This tradition continues today. Throughout the GSA, residents are witnessing unprecedented changes to the land, rivers, and lakes (Gill et al. 2014). Until recently, interactions between the Gwich'in and the seasons, land, and animals operated in a predictable cycle (Fig. 1). This seasonal rhythm, however, is changing rapidly. As landscapes change, Gwich'in land users frequently observe novel conditions and can no longer consistently rely on knowledge of seasonal patterns. For instance, community members noted an unseasonably warm March in 2019, when it rained instead of snowed. This had not happened in living memory, and reflects increasing March temperatures (Fig. 2). A.S. noticed unusual seasonal temperatures for the rest of 2019. He wore winter clothing in July, but a t-shirt in September, when conditions are typically frosty. These seasonal shifts have resulted in uncertainty, and A.V. was unsure whether it would stay cold or warm up amidst these unpredictable changes. Other unusual conditions contribute to uncertainty, including changing river hydrology and flow phenology (Yang et al. 2015). Near Fort McPherson, Northwest Territories, average monthly discharge of the Peel River is changing, with trends varying among months (Fig. 2). August flow has been decreasing through time (Fig. 2), similar to elsewhere in the Mackenzie River Basin (Bawden et al. 2014). These and other unusual conditions affect harvesters’ access to the river. In autumn 2019, A.S. witnessed rapidly changing water levels on the Peel River, including the lowest flows he had ever witnessed at his camp. In 1 day, water levels dropped so quickly that he could not repeat his boat route in the same day, a highly unusual occurrence. Uncertainties and unpredictability in environmental conditions affect Gwich'in land use. For instance, climate variability compromises harvest predictability (Fig. 1), and changing river phenology affects fishing practices. Gwich'in ancestors knew when to set nets, and taught A.S. to start fishing around 26 June. In 2019, he set a net on 10 June—over 2 weeks ahead of the traditional schedule—and caught many fish. A.S. had never experienced this, associating it with warmer temperatures and early ice breakup. These changes have land users concerned about fish migration, spawning, and competition from new species. In the last few years, A.S. has caught fish with mature eggs in November, something typically seen in October. Additionally, A.V. noted rapidly increasing numbers of Pacific salmon in Gwich'in territory. All 5 Pacific salmon species have now been caught in the Arctic, and community members are concerned they will compete with subsistence fishes (Dunmall 2018). In response to shifting and unpredictable phenology, Gwich'in land users combine TK with an innovative mindset. Researchers increasingly cite Indigenous Peoples’ relationships to the land and TK as factors that enhance responses to social–ecological changes (i.e., adaptive capacity [Ford 2012]). Gwich'in community members are adapting in multiple ways, including modifying fishing techniques. For example, changing hydrology has changed river morphology. During low water in 2019, E.V. could not fish in his traditional eddy, so he set his net near a recently formed sand bar and successfully caught fish. Additionally, A.V. determined how to dry fish in damp, unexpectedly cool summer weather: keep a woodstove burning in the drying house to prevent mold. In a third example, A.S. prepared to fish ahead of schedule in 2020. Although water levels were too high, he will remain flexible in the future. By devising new fishing techniques in response to change, E.V. and A.V. are adapting to uncertain conditions. Gwich'in community members are passing on this new knowledge by teaching youth land-based skills. Teaching about both traditional environmental conditions and new, variable conditions creates a strong foundation of traditional and adaptive practices. With his sons, A.S. plans to teach land-based skills to youth who have not had the opportunity to learn. It is important to him that local youth, in a time when they see younger generations protesting climate change globally, know they can learn to survive. A.V. and E.V. also teach youth, and A.V. shares similar feelings, quoting another community member who said: “Eventually, we're going to have to go back on the land.” She strongly feels that youth need to know their traditional ways of life alongside how the land is changing. E.V. says teaching youth is important to protect people's lifestyles and put food on the table. A.S. emphasizes that they have to teach TK differently because of unpredictability: He feels that he has to find new ways to survive by continuing to utilize everything the Elders taught him and also adapting some of these practices. Gwich'in community members are also sharing knowledge outside of their community, including with researchers. Like many community members, AS., A.V., and E.V. wonder what unpredictable conditions mean for the animals they harvest. This has driven their involvement in research. A.V. hopes her observations will inspire ideas for addressing changing landscapes and lifestyles. A.V. and E.V. stress the importance of including youth in research, to provide training, exposure to biology and other disciplines, and time on the land (Hovel et al. 2020). For E.V., knowledge coproduction instills hope that fish will not be neglected. The projects described here coproduce knowledge by centering community priorities around adaptation to changing phenology, providing opportunities for youth and combining TK and Western science to understand the impacts of changing environments. It is increasingly recognized that collaboration with Indigenous communities is essential to doing meaningful scientific research about environmental change (Ban et al. 2018). When conducted in a way that respects multiple approaches and recognizes the validity of different knowledge systems, incorporating both TK and Western science can strengthen project design and implementation and provide unique insights (Pearce 2018). The mutually beneficial projects described here were motivated by the importance of łuk dagaii to Gwich'in ways of life. We adapted scientific methods based on Gwich'in knowledge to answer questions and implement methods relevant to all parties. Gwich'in knowledge is central to study design (e.g., when, where, and how to sample fish without compromising fish drying techniques), and Gwich'in adaptive strategies have ensured fishing success despite fluctuating water levels and uncertainty in migration phenology. Gwich'in observations of environmental change and adaptive responses highlight research areas that require further attention across the north. For instance, substantial scientific knowledge gaps remain for northern fish species (Dey et al. 2018). In Gwich'in territory, life history patterns and habitat requirements are uncertain for many species, although scientific research in the region has occurred for decades (Reist 1989; Harris et al. 2012). Gwich'in knowledge can help fill these knowledge gaps, and Gwich'in observations of changing seasonal phenology have prompted additional questions of interest to community members and researchers. These include questions about fish spawning, migration, phenology, abundance, and interactions with new species and safety concerns over accessing the river. Complementary scientific tools can address questions that cannot be answered fully with TK, such as tracking life-long fish movements (Hodgson et al. 2020). Detailed observations and adaptive strategies make Indigenous land users powerful players in research on global ecological change. Indigenous groups around the world possess longstanding TK about their territories, foster high amounts of biodiversity, and have significant adaptive capacities (Ford 2012; Schuster et al. 2019). We believe that focusing on these experiences at local scales lends numerous benefits, including the following: local voices highlight the impacts of global climate change at scales relevant to social–ecological systems; local experiences showcase innovative adaptive strategies that are effective within or across regions; and collaborations between communities and researchers extend local experiences with environmental change and adaptation to broader audiences. In these ways, collaborative work addresses pressing questions on social–ecological change relevant to local communities and global audiences. This comprehensive approach informs understandings of patterns of climate change and adaptations at the spatial and temporal scales at which they are expressed. We thank the communities of Fort McPherson, Aklavik, Tsiigehtchic, and Inuvik for their generosity and support. This work was funded by the Northwest Territories Cumulative Impacts Monitoring Program, the Gwich'in Renewable Resources Board's Wildlife Studies Fund, the Northwest Territories On the Land Program, and the Liber Ero Fellowship Program. We also thank the 3 anonymous reviewers and the editors for suggestions that improved this manuscript. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,602
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,089
Tête enseignante GPT0,358
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2020
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueConservation BiologyMême sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207