MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3110686645 · doi:10.1111/dmcn.14735

Improving Quality of Life for Individuals with Cerebral Palsy through Treatment of Gait Impairment: International Cerebral Palsy Function and Mobility Symposium Edited by Thomas FNovacheck and Michael HSchwartzLondon: Mac Keith Press, 2020 £65.00 (Softback), pp 176. ISBN: 9781911612414

2020· article· en· W3110686645 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Henry G. Chambers

Notice bibliographique

RevueDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCerebral palsyPsychologyIntervention (counseling)Quality of life (healthcare)MedicineGerontologyPsychotherapistPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This new offering from Mac Keith Press’ Clinics in Developmental Medicine series is a fascinating look at the current state of affairs in the treatment of cerebral palsy (CP). The genesis of the book was a conference held in Banff, Alberta, Canada in December 2019, which was attended by many of the world's experts in the field. These leaders and practitioners met to discuss the breadth of movement disorders, muscle physiology, orthopedics, outcome measures, etc. and to determine how present-day treatments are affecting patients under their care. Individual chapters present the state of the art in the literature, the authors' interpretations of the literature, and personal opinions on aspects of their particular expertise. Each chapter also provides a 5-year plan: what questions needed to be asked and a roadmap for obtaining answers. This is a unique use of material generated by a symposium and should be applauded. The technology discussed in the second chapter is interesting, but sometimes reads like an advertisement for a system that is not on the market yet. The question and answer format is certainly thought-provoking, but can become repetitive and ultimately detracts somewhat from the chapter. Chapter 3 gives a plethora of information on outcome measures. It would have been nice to have an outline of which outcome measures should be used for each of the dimensions of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Most of the questions were related to ambulatory patients and the outcomes of intervention. The term ‘Babylonian Confusion’ should be defined in Chapter 4. I agree that there is much confusion in the field and it often feels like we are speaking different languages describing the same problem. Video links to examples of what the authors (and other professionals) would define as spasticity, dystonia, etc., with scales and various tests that assess these problems, may have been helpful adjuncts to this chapter. There is an excellent chapter on treatment of spasticity and dystonia. I was surprised that there was no mention of the botulinum toxin type B and/or the other, newer toxins on the horizon, especially in the 5-year plan. It was equally surprising that intrathecal baclofen was not mentioned more often in the treatment of dystonia (vs the use of deep brain stimulation). While there was some overlap in the two chapters on muscle physiology, there is excellent data with the potential for improvements in treatment of spasticity and contractures, utilizing basic science and potential translational research advances. Since this is a textbook, the personal opinions of the contributors are included in the text. But this subjectivity is tempered by the fact that all the authors felt further study was necessary in order to test their hypotheses. I especially enjoyed the chapter on musculoskeletal tendon unit dysfunction. It is obvious that the authors have spent their entire careers thinking about and grappling with these problems. It is also instructive to know that while we are still relying on surgery to lengthen muscles, there might be new ways to treat these problems just around the corner. I highly recommend Improving Quality of Life for Individuals with Cerebral Palsy through Treatment of Gait Impairment for all of us who care for children and adults with CP. As mentioned, there is a very good review of the literature but most importantly, the gaps in our knowledge are addressed—and could be filled in—by the 5-year plans offered. The editors and authors should be congratulated for taking this complex condition on in such a systematic manner and making it accessible for all.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,072
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,239

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0720,036

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology→Même sujetCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders→Travaux en français237 207→