MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3111826397 · doi:10.15695/amqst.v10i1.3813

Maureen Baker, Academic Careers and the Gender Gap

2013· article· en· W3111826397 sur OpenAlex
Caroline Farrior Boone

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmeriQuests · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiversity and Career in Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGender gapPolitical scienceSociologyPsychologyGender studiesDemographic economicsEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In Academic Careers and the Gender Gap, Baker demonstrates how the gender gap and university institutions have changed simultaneously over time and offers an explanation as to why the gender gap persists in liberal states despite numerous economical, social, and institutional advances that have been made: "The gender gap has been diminishing for decades, yet it is nonetheless perpetuated by institutional priorities, academic practices, collegial relations, variations in family circumstances, and gendered priorities," Baker writes (173).The first study, which she undertook in 1978, dealt with women employed at University of Alberta in western Canada (175).The following two studies, each conducted in 2008 at two different universities in New Zealand, focused on comparing responses from both men and women (175).In an effort to situate her findings in a global context, Baker complements her own research with results and statistics from studies done in the following liberal states: the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia (17).Baker cautions the reader however that her studies are not meant to provide "a systematic comparison" of the gender gap in either country, but rather to promote "a fuller understanding of the personal experiences and perceptions of individual academics" (175).With 38 years of experience in the academic field at the time of her book's publication, Baker is no doubt well-qualified in and knowledgeable of her chosen area of study on both a practical and a theoretical level (21).Having taught and researched at the university-level in five different liberal states, Baker no doubt has an insider's perspective on the glass-ceiling predicament and knows the long hours and hard work involved in obtaining and maintaining a successful academic career (21).Furthermore, Baker uses feminist political economy theories, social capital theories, and interpretive frameworks as lenses through which to examine the gender gap.She also considers how 'the motherhood penalty,' as well the domestic division of labor, effect women's experiences in academia.Overall, Baker's study is organized and presented well.Baker initiates each chapter with colorful, verbatim quotes taken from interviews she conducted."[My parents] thought that after I got my PhD I would settle down and be 'normal'. . .They brag about what I have done, but they think I'm a deviant," reads one quotation from a part-time Canadian lecturer in 1973 (26).Before launching into new material in each chapter, Baker quickly and briefly reviews findings from previous chapters and finishes each chapter with well-written conclusions.Though these recapitulations seem repetitive at times, they ultimately help keep the reader on track and prevent him or her from getting lost in the large amounts of data that are presented.Furthermore, Baker divides her chapters into themed sections, which are then separated into subsections by the year in which studies were conducted.For example, Baker divides her chapter entitled "Social Capital and Gendered Responses to University Practices," into sections discussing job qualifications, mentoring trends, hiring practices, and even institutional support programs.For each of these topics, Baker presents data that is clearly delineated by year, thereby making continuities or differences easier to spot.Though Baker's work is well researched and well documented, as evidenced by her extensive list of references, her study does harbor some limitations of which the reader should be aware.Her studies each consisted of relatively small samples and were not selected at random, two characteristics that prevent us from drawing any general conclusions from her work.Baker herself acknowledges this disadvantage (180).Furthermore, Baker acknowledges that the differences among teaching and research universities are "blurred" as more academics at each type of institution are pressured to produce more research (7).Additional studies with a focus on smaller liberal arts colleges might be an interesting expansion on her existing study.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,322
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle