MétaCan
← tous les travaux

<i>Retracted</i>: First report of <i>Clonostachys rosea</i> causing root rot of <i>Beta vulgaris</i> in North Dakota, USA

2020· article· en· 5 citations· W3112300384 sur OpenAlex· 10.5197/j.2044-0588.2020.042.021

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Porte sur le CanadaSon objet est le Canada, où que soient ses auteurs.

Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Dossier post-publication

Nature
Retraction
Motif
Error in Text;Lack of Approval from Company/Institution;
Date
6/17/2021 0:00
Signalé par OpenAlex ?
Oui

Source : Retraction Watch, jointe par DOI. OpenAlex consigne la rétractation dans is_retracted, un booléen sur un espace d'états à au moins quatre valeurs ; il ne peut donc exprimer ni une expression de préoccupation, ni une correction, ni un rétablissement, et les rapporte comme false, ce qui se lit comme « rien à signaler ».

Résumé

In August 2018, sugar beet plants with dull green and chlorotic foliage were observed in Hickson (46.6694°N, 96.8104°W), North Dakota. The taproots were found to have several circular brown to black necrotic lesions (Fig. 1) and the disease incidence was about 5%. Beet roots were washed to remove soil particles, surface-sterilised in a 10% NaOCl solution for 1 minute, and dipped twice in sterile water. Isolations were done on potato dextrose agar (72 hr at 25 ±2°C). All colonies were white and the surface was feathery (Fig. 2). Ten isolates were examined and these consistently had verticillate and penicillate conidiophores (primary and secondary) similar to those illustrated by Afshari & Hemmati (1). Conidia were 6.2 to 9.5 μm × 5.9 to 8.9 μm (Fig. 3). Five pure cultures were prepared by single spore isolation. The morphology of isolates was consistent with Clonostachys rosea (Moreira et al., 3; Sun et al., 5). DNA was extracted from four isolates using a Norgen Biotek Corp. protocol (Canada, Cat.27300). Isolates were confirmed via sequencing (GenScript, Piscataway, USA) using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS1F/ITS4). A BLAST search demonstrated that the 539 bp sequence was 100% identical to C. rosea (GenBank Accession No. KM519669.1). An annotated DNA sequence was deposited into GenBank as MN186772.1. Greenhouse pathogenicity tests were undertaken on sugar beet using the sequenced isolate. Three-week-old C. rosea cultures were mixed with vermiculite and perlite mixer (PRO-MIX FLX, USA) in plastic trays (61 ×38 × 25 cm). For the control treatment no inoculum was added. Sterile water (500 ml/ tray) was added to the mixer to maintain sufficient moisture. Ten seeds of sugar beet cv. Crystal 101 were sown per tray, and the trays replicated thrice with inoculated and control treatments and maintained at 22°C, 75% relative humidity. Plants were watered as needed to maintain adequate soil moisture conducive for plant growth and disease development. After eight weeks, plants were harvested and root rot assessed. Taproots of 16 of the 30 inoculated plants had similar root rot symptoms as described previously (Fig. 4). No disease was observed in control plants. Clonostachys rosea was consistently reisolated from the diseased taproots and its identity confirmed using morphological and molecular methods, thus fulfilling Koch's postulates. Clonostachys rosea has been reported commonly as a mycoparasite or saprotrophic species from soil and various plant materials (Schroers et al., 4). However, there are a few reports of C. rosea causing root rots in soybean in Minnesota (Bienapfl et al., 2) and in faba bean in Iran (Afshari & Hemmati, 2017). To our best knowledge, this is the first report of C. rosea causing root rot of sugar beet in the USA, or worldwide. The authors are thankful to Dr. R. Reeder for his suggestions and technical support.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

La notice

Revue
New Disease Reports
Thématique
Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Domaine
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Établissements canadiens
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
BiologyConidiumSugar beetRoot rotPotato dextrose agarHorticultureBotanyGenBankSporePathogenicityAgarMicrobiologyGene
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui