MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3113129401 · doi:10.22067/econg.v11i1.69424

زمین شناسی، کانی سازی، ژئوشیمی اکتشافی، پتروژنز، سن سنجی U-Pb و ایزوتوپ های Lu-Hf روی کانی زیرکن توده های نیمه عمیق در محدوده اکتشافی سیمرغ، بلوک لوت، شرق ایران

2019· article· fa· W3113129401 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
رضا برآبادی, سید احمد مظاهری, محمد حسن کریم پور

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2019
Typearticle
Languefa
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction The Simorgh prospect area is located in 113 km southwest of the Nehbandan in South Khorasan province. This area is part of the Tertiary volcanic-plutonic rocks in the center of the Lut block. The Lut Block, which is located at the eastern part of the Central Iranian Microcontinent (CIM), is famous by its complex tectonic evolution and extensive magmatic activities with a range of interesting geochemistry. Extensive magmatic activities in Lut Block have produced several types of mineralization events (Karimpour et al., 2012). Around the Simorgh prospect area, various mineral deposits, including Cu-Mo porphyry Dehsalm in 90 km southwest of Nehbandan have been reported (Arjmandzadeh and Santos 2013) and Mahoor copper (Miri Beydokhti et al., 2015). Until now there has not been a detailed studies on the Simorgh prospect area especially on granitoids. In this study, we present field investigations, geology, alteration, mineralization, geochemical exploration, Petrogenesis, zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotopes of sub-volcanic rocks in the Simorgh prospect area. Materials and methods 1- Preparation of 336 thin sections for the study of petrography, alteration and mapping of geological and alteration maps. 2- Preparation and study of twenty-five polished thin sections and thirty-two polished blocks for mineralization studies. 3- Analysis of forty-five chip composite samples in the Zar Azma laboratory by using the fire assay method for Au element and ICP-OES for thirty-four elements. The solubilization method of 4- Acid (1EX) was used. 4- Analysis of one hundred and sixty core samples in the Zar Azma laboratory by using the fire assay method for Au element and ICP-OES for 34 elements (method 1EX). 5- Chemical analysis of seventeen samples of syn-mineralization sub-volvanic intrusive rocks with at least alteration, by ICP-MS for thirty-one trace and rare earth elements with LF100 method (alkali fusion) at the AcmeLabs Laboratory. 6- Separation of three samples from syn-mineralization sub-volcanic intrusive rocks for U-Pb zircon geochronolg by Quadruple Laser-Ablation ICP-MS at the CODES, the Tasmania University of Australia. 7- Analysis of three samples of syn-mineralization sub-volvanic intrusive rocks for Lu-Hf isotopes with multi-collector ICP-MS at the CCFS of Macquarie University of Sydney, Australia. Discussion and results Petrographic studies indicated that the composition of sub-volcanic rocks in the Simorgh area are diorite porphyry and pyroxene diorite porphyry stocks with granite porphyry and granodiorite porphyry dikes. Several alteration zones such as: propylitic, argillic, silicified quartz-sericite-pyrite (QSP) and carbonate-quartz-sericite-pyrite (CQSP) based on field and laboratory studies are identified Major oxides analysis shows that intrusive units are metaluminous to peraluminus, calc-alkaline to high-K calc-alkaline. More of these rocks belong to the I-type granitoid (Chappell and White, 2001), and they have been formed in a volcanic arc granitoids (VAG) tectonic setting (Pearce et al., 1984). Mantle-normalized, trace-element spider diagrams display enrichment in large ion lithophile elements, such as Rb, Sr, K, and Cs, and depletion in high field strength elements, e.g., Nb, Ti, P. Enrichment of LREE versus HREE and enrichment of LILE and depletion in HFSE indicate magma formation in the subduction zone. In the subduction zones, high oxygen fugacity leads to the depletion of Ti. All of the intrusive rocks have a negative Eu anomaly. The amount of Eu/Eu* in sub-volcanic units of the Simorgh area varies from 0.49 to 0.91. Therefore, negative Eu anomaly can be evidence of the partial presence of plagioclase in the origin (Tepper et al., 1993). Three types of mineralization occur in this area such as: veinlet, disseminated and hydrothermal breccia among which hydrothermal breccia is the most important. Pyrite is the most sulfide mineralization in the sub-volcanic and hydrothermal breccias. Compositional variations of elements within the Simorgh prospect are as follows: Cu = 2-240 ppm, Mo = 0.5-49 ppm, Zn = 9-935 ppm, Pb = 7-582 ppm, ppm, As = 2-207 ppm and Au = 1-93 ppb. In the Simorgh area, zircon U-Pb geochronology was carried out on syn-mineralization sub-volcanic intrusive rocks. The age of two granite porphyry dikes are 25.37±0.56 Ma and 25.94±0.76 Ma and the age of pyroxene porphyry diorite is 24.85±0.51 Ma (Chattian). Diorite porphyry is pre-mineralization because it is cut by granite porphyry dikes and pyroxene diorite porphyry, so diorite porphyry is the oldest sub-volcanic intrusive rock in this area. The low positive values of εHf(i) indicate that the origin of these sub-volcanic intrusive rocks is mantle, which has low contamination with the crust. According to the above evidence, the sub-volcanic units of this area are related to porphyry systems, and the hydrothermal breccias are the main host rock mineralization in this system. This system does not have any valuable mineralization expect pyrite, from the surface to 180 m depth. References Arjmandzadeh, R. and Santos, J.F., 2013. Sr-Nd isotope geochemistry and tectonomagmatic setting of the Dehsalm Cu-Mo porphyry mineralizing intrusives from Lut Block, eastern Iran. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 103(1): 123–140. Chappell, B. and White, A., 2001. Two contrasting granite types: 25 years later. Australian Journal Earth Sciences, 48(4): 489–499. Karimpour, M.H., Malekzadeh shafaroudi, A., Farmer, G.L. and Stern, C.R., 2012. Petrogenesis of Granitoids, U-Pb zircon geochronology, Sr-Nd Petrogenesis of granitoids, U-Pb zircon geochronology, Sr-Nd isotopic characteristics, and important occurrence of Tertiary mineralization within the Lut block, eastern Iran. Journal of Economic Geology, 4(1): 1–28. (in Persian with English abstract) Miri Beydokhti, R., Karimpour, M.H., Mazaheri, S.A., Santos, J.F. and Klötzlid, U., 2015. U-Pb zircon geochronology, Sr-Nd geochemistry, petrogenesis and tectonic setting of Mahoor granitoid rocks (Lut Block, Eastern Iran). Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 111(1): 192–205. Pearce, J.A., Harris, N.B.W. and Tindle, A.G., 1984. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. Journal of Petrology, 25(4): 956–983. Tepper, J.H., Nelson, B.K., Bergantz, G.W. and Irving, A.J., 1993. Petrology of the Chilliwack batholith, North Cascades, Washington: generation of calc-alkaline granitoids by melting of mafic lower crust with variable water fugacity. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 113(3): 333–351.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,219
Tête enseignante GPT0,513
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Même sujetGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→Travaux en français237 207→