SOCIO-CULTURAL MISSION OF THE CANADIAN UKRAINIAN CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER «OSEREDOK» (second quarter of 20th - beginning of 21st century)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The purpose of this article is to consider the activities of the Ukrainian Cultural and Educational Center «Oseredok» and the theoretical justification of its contribution to the collection, research, preservation and exhibition of historical, cultural and spiritual heritage of the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada. «Oseredok» became not only a model of Ukrainian studies education, but also an important center for the development of Ukrainian-Canadian relations, and also influenced the development of Canadian culture in general. To achieve this goal, the necessary number of sources and historiographical literature touched on various aspects of the problem were examined. Such general historical scientific research methods as historical-genetic, historical-comparative and historical-typological were used.The relevance of this study is related to the modern national-cultural movement, which is embodied in the activities of organizations, art, educational and scientific centers, the introduction of new Ukrainian festivals, the study of previously classified, archival documents. Some aspects of this problem were revealed in the works of such researchers as: Jus O. V., Matyash I. B., Solonskaya N. G. and Priymak T. M. However, in our opinion, the monument protection and sociocultural activities of the Ukrainian Cultural and Educational Center «Oseredok» is worth more indepth research.Thus, the Ukrainian Cultural and Educational Center «Oseredok» was the unifying force that brought together under one cultural cover Ukrainians with different religious beliefs, political views and values. The founders and patrons of the «Oseredok» were prominent Ukrainian figures: O. Koshetz, T. Koshetz, P. Matsenko, M. Mandryka, T. Pavlychenko, P. Yuzyk, V. Kossar, M. Marunchak, J. Rudnytsky and others. For 76 years, Oseredok has become the guarantor of the collective memory of the Ukrainian people. Even the house of the organization, formerly the House of the Bible Society, has great spiritual power, which contributes to a noble socio-cultural mission. The versatility of the Center's activities, which includes archival, library, museum, educational and publishing work, is striking. The archive of the organization has the largest collection of documents, memoirs, photographs, maps in Canada, which covers the period of 16th - 20th centuries. Valuable are the documents and memoirs of I. M. Bobersky, E. M. Konovalets, the Koshets family, as well as a monument of the 18th century – Irmola by Georgy Tyapetsky. «Oseredok» has a rich library collection of more than 40 thousand volumes and 10 thousand periodicals. Nomocanon of the 17th century is a very rare book. The collection of the museum of the Center consists of 8 thousand exhibits, which includes objects of decorative and applied arts, musical instruments, church utensils, personal belongings. In the collections of the art gallery you can see paintings by more than 30 Ukrainian artists from realism to avant-garde. The Center has higher education courses that have brought up many prominent Ukrainians. The publishing activity of the center not only contributed to the development of science and art, but also acquainted the whole world with the rich Ukrainian culture. Thus, Ukrainian Cultural and Educational Centre «Oseredok» is a model of cultural preservation organization.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».