Europium Doped Silicon Oxide Thin Films Using an Integrated PECVD and Sputtering System
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over the last decades, silicon-based materials have exhibited outstanding electronic properties and been used in photovoltaic and electrical devices such as transistors [1]. However, due to their indirect band gap nature and poor light emitting properties, they are not satisfying candidates when it comes to photonics. One way through which this poor performance is sorted out is doping of rare earth (RE) elements into the silicon nanostructure thin film to enhance the light emission. The reason for the use of RE elements in silicon-based materials is the fact that they showed well-defined emission peaks and 4f electron shielding making them independence of the host matrix [2]. In this study, luminescence properties of Europium (Eu) doped oxygen rich silicon oxide (ORSO) materials using two fabrication techniques are discussed as well as controlling of the Eu concentration, argon partial pressure and sputtering power. In addition, the effect of different annealing atmospheres is observed as here pure nitrogen (N2) and forming gas (N2+5% H2) are tested at a variety of deposition temperatures ranging between 300 °C and 1350 °C. In particular, samples subjected to the higher annealing temperatures of 1200 °C and 1350 °C behave differently in comparison with lower annealing temperatures where their structural and photoluminescence (PL) properties are investigated in more details. The introducing of Eu into ORSO host matrix was performed by two different deposition methods with the first one being the conventional method of metal organic powders where RE elements are introduced using electron cyclotron resonance plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (ECR-PECVD) system. The second method involves the use of a novel and custom-made integration of ECR-PECVD and magnetron sputtering [3]. The investigation of a variation of optical and structural properties of the samples made with similar deposition parameters using these two different techniques resulted in insignificant light emission of the ones fabricated with metal organic precursor and remarkable emission of the samples produced using the integrated ECR-PECVD and sputtering method. Variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (VASE) measurements are carried to comprehend the refractive index and thin films thicknesses, and their dependence on the deposition parameters such as the sputtering power. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) measurements provide the film composition and verify a good control of the Eu concentration using the second deposition method (integrated ECR-PECVD and sputtering). X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) confirm the formation of nanostructures in the Eu-ORSO thin films following post-deposition annealing beyond 1200 °C. The PL studies are performed to study the light emission properties of Eu-ORSO thin films and the changes introduced by the hydrogen passivation. Figure 1 shows the influence of hydrogen passivation on one of the Eu-ORSO thin films containing 0.1 ± 0.01 at. % of Eu. The sample is annealed at 1200 °C and 1350 °C using N2 and N2+H2 atmospheres for 1 hour in the quartz tube furnace. The hydrogen passivation enhances the PL emission by one order of magnitude possibly due to the passivation of the defects and dangling bonds. References: 1-Priolo, F., Gregorkiewicz, T., Galli, M., & Krauss, T. F. (2014). Silicon nanostructures for photonics and photovoltaics. Nature Nanotechnology, 9(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.271 2- Kenyon, A. J. (2002). Recent developments in rare-earth doped materials for optoelectronics. In Progress in Quantum Electronics (Vol. 26). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6727(02)00014-9 3- Miller, J. W., Khatami, Z., Wojcik, J., Bradley, J. D. B., & Mascher, P. (2018). Integrated ECR-PECVD and magnetron sputtering system for rare-earth-doped Si-based materials. Surface and Coatings Technology, 336, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.08.051 Figure 1
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».