Adelina Iftene Punished for Aging: Vulnerability, Rights, and Access to Justice in Canadian Penitentiaries. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2019, 264 pp.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
How are the rights of incarcerated people upheld, or not, in Canada?Which concrete strategies could and should be deployed to improve conditions of confinement or facilitate prisoners' release in the community?As Adelina Iftene concedes, such questions "are not new" (242).But by answering them through a novel and timely case study, specifically the "extreme situation of older prisoners" (32), her book Punished for Aging: Vulnerability, Rights, and Access to Justice in Canadian Penitentiaries makes a valuable intervention into ongoing debates about the promises and perils of prison reform.Iftene is one of a few scholars to have been granted research access by the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) in recent years.Her book therefore offers exceptional insights into the realities of 197 older prisoners she recruited and interviewed in seven federal correctional institutions.In Chapter 1, readers are introduced first to Canada's federal prison system with an overview of CSC's organizational structure and then to the problem of aging in prison with a succinct review of prior research.Chapter 2 presents the bulk of the qualitative and quantitative data the author gathered in federal prisons, which underlines older prisoners' many aging-related struggles.Here and in later chapters, the stories of two interviewees, John and Eric, provide a narrative thread for Iftene to weave in other pieces of evidence.They and other interlocutors report experiencing varied and worsening health problems and facing multiple situational, infrastructural, and policy-legitimated barriers to accessing proper care or being released.The book warns that seniors represent a growing population that is both higher-need and more vulnerable than other prisoners, yet whose particularities CSC appears illequipped, if not resistant, to address.Empirical evidence of older prisoners' self-described hardships and of the correctional practices that exacerbate them constitutes a significant contribution to the literature on Canadian imprisonment.But Punished for Aging goes beyond reiterating what numerous critiques have already identified as the federal system's flawed approach to accommodating the needs of older groups of prisoners.Studying the (mis)treatment of older individuals in federal prisons is instead a starting point for Iftene to explore how CSC's practices "may also be against the law" (79).In the rest of the book, the author thus engages in a meticulous analysis of the institutional, administrative, and judicial means that are allegedly within prisoners' reach to rectify instances of neglect or abuse.In Chapter 3, readers learn that health services and accommodations for seniors are deficient in federal prisons, yet that these prisoners are unlikely to be released.Chapter 4 shows that oversight mechanisms may serve to denounce correctional practices but otherwise lack "the power to order meaningful and enforceable remedies" (136).Chapter 5 demonstrates that CSC's internal grievance system is lengthy, bureaucratic, and inept at yielding solutions and, in turn,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».