Antenatal nutrition services offer in primary health care facilities of Kolda region, Senegal
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Both under and overnutrition have been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Hence, quality nutrition services are essential during pregnancy to help ensuring a healthy diet for expecting women especially in countries where malnutrition including anaemia is high, such as Senegal. Based on the Donabedian model of quality of care, the offer of nutrition services during antenatal care (ANC) was assessed in health facilities of Kolda region, Senegal. Methods A cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted among a random sample comprising 30% of the ANC providers of the region. Data on conditions and environment of health facilities were collected through direct observations as well as information on available equipment, materials and drugs/supplements. Data on ANC workforce such as their qualifications and supervision were gathered through a questionnaire. ANC providers were also asked to self-report their offer of nutrition services, including counseling. Results With the exception of blood analyses equipment as well as calcium and energy-protein supplements, over 90% of health facilities had materials, equipment and supplies for providing nutrition services. ANC providers were either midwives or nurses as required by national standards but over 60% were not supervised every two months as prescribed. About 20% of them had received some training in maternal nutrition. Only 30% of ANC providers reported asking pregnant women about eating habits including the use of iodized salt, resting and sleeping habits and 15% on night blindness. Regarding nutrition counseling, 60% mentioned that they were always providing general dietary advice, 50% recommended specific foods to gain weight and 20% reported talking always about potential side effects of iron and folic acid supplementation. Conclusions Although health providers have qualifications to perform ANC and work in a conducive environment, their capacities to provide nutrition services may be suboptimal. To some extent, this situation may contribute to the limited offer of nutrition services.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».