Impact of Solvent on Catalyst Layer for Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Anion exchange membrane fuel cell (AEMFC) is attractive energy conversion device that is an alternative to proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) which required expensive materials, including platinum-based catalysts and perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) ionomers. Operating under the alkaline environment, enables the use of various types of low cost platinum-free-catalysts and the inexpensive metal stack hardware, allowing the system to be configured at a much lower cost. Over the past several years, the development of anion exchange membrane (AEM) and ionomer (AEI) with high OH - conductivity and kinetically fast water diffusivity has resulted in significantly improved power performance of AEMFC. However, the problem of water imbalance during AEMFC operation becomes a hindrance to achieving more higher performance. In the anode, one water per electron is generated by hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) and water is consumed by the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) as a reactant in the cathode. Also, since the OH - migration from the cathode to the anode causes electro-osmotic drag and water molecules are transport to same direction, the difference of water content in both electrodes becomes larger. This water imbalance causes flooding in the anode and making it difficult to diffuse H 2 gas to the Pt surface, moreover, water dry-out in the cathode inhibit the OH - conduction of AEIs. These series of processes, finally, reduce the Pt utilization due to the depletion of reactants. Considering the previous studies, despite using AEM and AEI with sufficient OH - conductivity, high-loading of platinum (0.4 mgPt cm -2 or more) was used to achieve power performance. Compared to practical PEMFC (0.2 mgPt cm -2 or less), the amount of platinum is too large, and this low Pt utilization problem is fatal drawback to AEMFC commercialization, which is aimed at lower prices. To improve the Pt utilization of AEMFC, the redox-active site, called the triple-phase-boundary, where the contact region of catalyst, H 2 or O 2 reactant gas, and OH - conducting ionomer, should be maximized in catalyst layer. In manufacturing a catalyst layer having a plenty of triple-phase-boundary, inducing a homogeneous ionomer distribution is one of the most important components. As a similar perspective, the research on the ionomer distribution has recently been conducted intensively at PEMFC field. The most representative way to control the ionomer distribution is tuning the interaction between the ionomer, solvent, and catalyst. In our previous study, the size of the ionomer aggregates was controlled by changing interaction between the solvent and ionomer using different solvents. As a result, the more homogeneous ionomer distribution in the cathode catalyst layer lead to the better performance due to the facile proton migration, however, nanoscale ionomer aggregates can induce the pore clogging with a severe mass transport resistance. However, AEMFC has not yet reported any papers related to ionomer distribution, even only a few papers studied about pore structure of the catalyst layer. Thus, in-depth study of the catalyst layer needs to be required and constructing optimized catalyst layer that containing homogeneous ionomer distribution with high porosity is absolutely necessary for efficient use of the catalyst. Herein, we presented a rational design of the catalyst layer by controlling the ionomer distribution and pore structure via solvent selection of the catalyst slurry. The analytical methods introduced in this study can be universally used for any AEIs and catalysts, and a strategy for preparing a catalyst layer with high Pt utilization considering the size of AEI and catalyst will greatly contribute to the cost reduction of AEMFC for commercialization. As the solvent of this study, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), methanol (MeOH), and isopropanol (IPA) were selected, which have highly different dielectric constant and commonly used for making catalyst layer. Additionally, water was selected as a cosolvent to improve the dispersity of the catalyst slurry. By changing a solvent into higher dielectric constant, homogeneous ionomer distribution was constructed in catalyst layer, achieving high electrochemical surface area (ECSA) (72.1 m 2 gPt -1 ) in the cathode. The selection of solvent for inducing a low absolute zeta-potential on the catalyst surface enables the formation of highly porous catalyst layer, which can result in improved a power performance in anode. For the first time, we observed nanomorphology of AEI dispersed on the carbon surface by scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). The structure and performance of the catalyst layer different by solvents were analyzed using electron microscope and electrochemical methods. Finally, we discuss the optimized catalyst layer design for AEMFC to provide a guideline for future direction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».