Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A group of more than 25 agencies from Canada and the United States conducted a major offshore burn near Newfoundland, Canada, in 1993. Two batches of oil, about 50 tons each, were released into a fireproof boom. Each burn lasted more than one hour and was monitored for emissions and physical parameters. Over 200 sensors or samplers were employed to yield data on over 2000 parameters or substances. The experiment was the largest of its type ever conducted. The operation was extensive, with over 20 vessels, 7 aircraft and 230 people involved in the at-sea operation. The experiment resulted in extensive analytical data as well as significant operational data, some of which are presented in this chapter. The quantitative analytical data show that the emissions from this in-situ oil fire were less than expected. All compounds and parameters measured were below health concern levels beyond about 150 m from the fire, very little being detected beyond 500 m. The fate and behaviour of oil components in fires are, in many cases, the subject of further research. Pollutants were found to be at lower values in the Newfoundland offshore burn than they were in prior pan tests. The reason for this is the larger scale of the burn, resulting in more efficient combustion. Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were found to be lower in the soot than in the starting oil and were consumed by the fire to a large degree. Particulates in the air were measured by several means and found to be of concern only up to 150 m downwind at sea level. Particulate matter may not be a concern past this distance except perhaps in the plume remnants. Combustion gases including carbon dioxide, sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide did not reach levels of concern. These gases were emitted over a broad area around the fire and were not directly associated with the plume trajectory. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were abundant; however, they were less than emitted from the non-burning spill. Over 50 compounds were quantified, most at levels that would not cause concern. Water under the burns was analysed; no compounds of concern could be found at the detection level of the methods employed. Toxicity tests performed on this water did not show any adverse effect. The burn residue was analysed for the same compounds as the air samples. PAHs were found at lower concentrations in the residue than in the starting oil. The overall mass of PAHs, including that of the higher-molecular-weight species, was about 6 orders of magnitude lower after the burn. Overall, indications from these burn trials are that emissions from in-situ burning are low in comparison to other sources of emissions and result in acceptable concentrations of air contaminants.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,060 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».