Notice bibliographique
Résumé
russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. (winter ): – The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn –; online – d:\ken\documents\rj\type\rj .docx -- : AM Reviews FRANK RAMSEY: “HIS ACTUAL ACHIEVEMENT IS AMAZING”1 Nicholas Griffin Russell Research Centre / McMaster U. Hamilton, on Canada l8s 4l6 ngriffin@mcmaster.ca Cheryl Misak. Frank Ramsey: a Sheer Excess of Powers. Oxford, Toronto and NewYork: Oxford U. P., . Pp. xxxvi, . £.; cdn$.; us$. (hb). isbn: -----. he death of Frank Ramsey in January just before his twenty-seventh birthday, was the last nail in the coffin of the Cambridge school of mathematical logic.The Polish logician, Janina Hosiasson, was in Cambridge working on probability with Keynes when Ramsey died. She returned to Poland to report that little remained of “the logical school of Bertrand Russell”. Cambridge was left so destitute of logical talent that Max Black, who was in the final year of his MathematicalTripos when Ramsey died, was asked to recommend someone who could examine him on mathematical logic (Misak, p. ).Without Ramsey, logic as a subject of serious concern to philosophers withered, not just in Cambridge, but throughout the uk, for the next thirty or forty years. (Arthur Prior’s arrival from New Zealand in began to put things right.) But mathematical logic was only one of Ramsey’s concerns: he made important contributions to economics, probability theory, foundations of mathematics, philosophy of science, decision theory, combinatorics and graph theory (in an area now known as Ramsey theory) as well as to areas of philosophy outside of logic. And he translated Wittgenstein’s Tractatus—as a second-year undergraduate at the age of eighteen. Since so many of his contributions were seminal it is astonishing that, years after his death, we still do not have an authoritative edition of his writings and did not have, until now, a proper biography.2 1 Russell, review of Ramsey, The Foundations of Mathematics, Mind (); in Papers , p. . 2 The main collections of writings are: The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays (), cited here as FM, much of which is reprinted (along with some T Reviews d:\ken\documents\rj\type\rj .docx -- : AM Misak is well known for her extensive writings on pragmatism and the pragmatists , but this, to my knowledge, is her first biography and it is a very good one. For a life so short, there is an extraordinary amount of material to cope with, most of it unpublished and scattered in archives around the world. Misak has been thorough in tracking it down and weaving it into a very readable biography.3 One of the problems of writing a biography of someone who contributed at such a high level to so many different fields, is that it is impossible for the biographer to have expertise in all of them. Misak circumvents this by having experts contribute “guest boxes” to explain Ramsey’s various contributions : Misak puts the work in context and gives a simple account for the general reader, then the expert has their box to give (often) a much more technical account. Here she follows the lead of Hugh Mellor who, in editing Foundations, brought in various experts to introduce the papers. In both cases it works well. So well in the present volume that I thought it a pity that their various boxes were not listed in the table of contents so that one could find them more easily. (The boxes—especially the philosophical ones—also show how many times Ramsey was groping towards, hinting at, or on the brink of something really important which emerged only decades later. There really seems no limit to what he might have achieved, though it is worth reminding ourselves that not all his roads could have been taken.) Misak herself, of course, deals with most of the philosophy (at least outside of mathematical logic). Not surprisingly, she claims Ramsey for the pragmatists. Indeed, she had already done so in her previous book, cleverly titled Cambridge Pragmatism : from Peirce and James to Ramsey andWittgenstein. I shall come back to Ramsey’s place in the pragmatic pantheon. Ramsey seems to have been born intelligent. He irritated his caregivers by calling out...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,031 | 0,019 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».