<i>Versailles Meets the Taj Mahal: François Bernier, Marguerite de La Sablière, and Enlightening Conversations in Seventeenth-Century France</i> . By <scp>Faith</scp> E. <scp>Beasley</scp> <i>Versailles Meets the Taj Mahal: François Bernier, Marguerite de La Sablière, and Enlightening Conversations in Seventeenth-Century France</i> . By BeasleyFaith E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018. 384 pp.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
‘Entre tous les commerces qui se font dans toutes les parties du monde, il n’y en a point de plus riche, ni de plus considérable que celui des Indes orientales’: these words, written by François Charpentier in his Discours d’un fidèle sujet du roy, touchant l’establissement d’une compagnie françoise pour le commerce des Indes orientales (1664), offer a precious insight into how seventeenth-century France interacted with India. Faith E. Beasley’s most recent contribution to French studies challenges two dominant critical trends in the way we think about encounters between France and India in the early modern world. The first is that these encounters were shaped by a dichotomy between East and West, which Beasley argues is anachronistic and colonial. The second is that the eighteenth century was the period in which India became a particularly important source of interest and inspiration. By considering the traces and influences of encounters with India in some of the lesser-known work of François Bernier, Marguerite de La Sablière, Mme de Sévigné, Mme de La Fayette, and Jean de La Fontaine, Beasley tells a nuanced story of how seventeenth-century French culture became ‘indianized’ (p. 238). This rich and timely work combines close analysis of texts, images, and objects with historical contextualization and broad methodological reflections. The first of the four chapters reconstructs what Beasley calls a ‘nexus’ of France’s contact with India, primarily the salon of La Sablière (p. 25). Beasley places Bernier’s travel narratives within this salon context, and argues that these narratives were formed by the conversations that took place within that social space. Beasley’s analysis of Bernier’s text also uncovers an important distinction between France’s conceptions of India as opposed to a more general notion of ‘the Orient’. The centrality of salon culture is brought into sharper focus in Chapter 2, in which Beasley examines the extent to which Bernier’s image of India, so popular amongst his female public, shaped the evolution of the novel. In Chapter 3, Beasley reads La Fontaine’s Fables and Fontenelle’s Entretiens as further literary products of the specific encounter between France and India which, by virtue of being mediated by salon culture, paved the way to a particular kind of knowledge. This chapter concludes by considering the threat felt by Louis XIV in the face of such a celebration of diversity. This ‘taste for the foreign’ (p. 221) takes a material turn in Chapter 4, in which Beasley explores the importance of Indian influence with regards to the vibrant and elaborately patterned fashion and fabrics that were so popular amongst the subjects of Louis XIV. It was women, Beasley argues, who were the ‘driving force behind this new taste’ (p. 238), and who have been traditionally marginalized in this story. As is the case with much of Beasley’s other work, this study is characterized by creative encounters: between India and France, men and women, travellers and salonnières, and, methodologically speaking, between literary scholarship, the history of ideas, and the study of objects. Although the conversations that Beasley imagines are often hypothetical by nature, this thought-provoking book will particularly appeal to scholars of the early modern world who are interested in gender, the decolonization of history, and the dissemination of culture.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,021 | 0,017 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».