MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3119720896 · doi:10.1002/wps.20831

Glucocorticoid use and risk of suicide: a Danish population‐based case‐control study

2021· article· en· W3119720896 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristina Laugesen, Dóra Körmendiné Farkas, Mogens Vestergaard, Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen, Irene Petersen, Henrik Toft Sørensen

Notice bibliographique

RevueWorld Psychiatry · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAdrenal Hormones and Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesLundbeckfonden
Mots-clésMedicineGlucocorticoidPopulationSuicide attemptDanishOdds ratioPsychiatrySuicide preventionPublic healthPoison controlInternal medicineEmergency medicineEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Suicide is an important public health problem, with nearly 800,000 people dying worldwide every year. The World Health Organization has declared suicide prevention an international priority1. Glucocorticoid treatment is prevalent and beneficial for many chronic diseases2, but also associated with severe psychiatric adverse effects3. Evidence on an association between glucocorticoid treatment and suicide is sparse4, 5. A study conducted in patients registered at UK general practices4 pooled suicides and suicide attempts, although acknowledging that they represent two different phenomena that may or not be related. Persons treated with oral glucocorticoids were 7-fold more likely to attempt or die from suicide shortly after initiation of treatment, compared to persons with the same underlying conditions who did not receive these medications. A Canadian case-control study5, focusing on people aged 66 years or more, found an unadjusted odds ratio of 1.33 (95% CI: 0.88-2.00) for the association of glucocorticoid use and suicide. There is a need to confirm the association between glucocorticoid use and suicide in a large sample representative of the general population, and to evaluate whether the association depends on glucocorticoid administration form, time since initiation of glucocorticoid treatment, and underlying medical conditions and comorbidities. We examined the association between glucocorticoid use and suicide in a registry-based population-based case-control study in Denmark in the period between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2015 (cumulated population of 7,559,392 persons). From the Danish Register of Causes of Death6, we identified 14,028 suicide cases, and from the Civil Registration System7 we sampled 140,278 population controls using risk-set sampling and matching by birth year and sex. The suicide date served as the index date for cases and controls. We used the Danish National Prescription Registry, covering all Danish pharmacies8, to identify all prescriptions for glucocorticoids redeemed by cases and controls before their index date, and defined present, recent and former users of glucocorticoids as individuals who redeemed their most recent glucocorticoid prescription 0 to 90 days, 91 to 365 days, and more than 365 days before the index date, respectively. We further divided present users into new (individuals who redeemed their first-ever prescription ≤90 days before their index date) and prevalent (individuals who redeemed their most recent prescription ≤90 days before their index date and had a prior prescription redemption ever). The cumulative dose of most recent oral glucocorticoid prescription was calculated to assess a dose-response effect based on prednisolone equivalents. We examined oral glucocorticoids as well as injectable gluco­corticoids, inhaled glucocorticoids, and glucocorticoids administered topically in the intestine. For the locally acting glucocorticoids, we considered only exclusive use of each type. As regard covariates, we used the Danish Health Registries7 to obtain information on treatment indications (obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatic diseases, renal diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, skin diseases, other autoimmune diseases, and cancer), comorbidities (psychiatric diseases, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, osteoporosis, alcohol-related disorders), and co-medication use (opioids and antiepileptic medications). We used logistic regression to estimate crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for suicide among present, new, prevalent, recent and former users of glucocorticoids compared to never users. As we used risk-set sampling, the estimated odds ratios from the logistic regression provided unbiased estimates of the IRRs9. We found that cancer modified the association and therefore stratified our analyses by cancer. We further estimated incidence rate differences using a back-calculation method. Median age for both cases and controls was 53 years, and 72% were men; 10% of cases and 7.3% of controls had a prior cancer diagnosis, and 67% of cases and 20% of controls had a prior psychiatric disease. New use of oral glucocorticoids was associated with a 7-fold increased risk of suicide in individuals with cancer (adjusted IRR=7.2, 95% CI: 5.0-11), and with a 2-fold increased risk in individuals with other treatment indications (adjusted IRR=2.0, 95% CI: 1.5-2.8), compared to never use. The rate differences were 7.6 per 10,000 person years (95% CI: –1.7 to 17) and 1.4 per 10,000 person years (95% CI: –8.9 to 12), respectively. The median cumulative dose of most recent oral glucocorticoid prescription was higher among individuals with cancer than without (2,000 mg vs. 500 mg prednisolone equivalents), and we found a dose-response effect. Adjusted IRRs for suicide according to the prednisolone-equivalent cumulative dose of most recent prescription were 1.2 (95% CI: 0.36-4.0) for dose <250 mg; 3.0 (95% CI: 1.2-7.8) for 250-499 mg; 3.4 (95% CI: 1.9-6.2) for 500-999 mg, and 20 (95% CI: 10-41) for doses ≥1000 mg, compared to never use. The association was consistent across treatment indications and comorbidities, stronger among people below 30 and above 50 years of age, and similar among men and women. Recent and former use of oral glucocorticoids, as well as other administration forms (inhaled, injectable, and topically in the intestine), were not associated with suicide. Other administration forms have lower bioavailability, lower systemic absorption and are often used in lower doses compared to systemic glucocorticoids, which may explain these findings. We conducted several sensitivity analyses. Residual confounding by disease severity cannot be entirely ruled out. However, our results remained robust to confounding by cancer stage and timing. We calculated E-values to examine the impact of potential unmeasured confounding. The E-value indicated that an unmeasured confounding factor needed to be associated with both glucocorticoid use and suicide with a relative risk of 14 and 3.4, in cancer and non-cancer patients respectively, to fully explain our findings (i.e., only strong confounding could explain our data). We concluded that oral glucocorticoid initiation was associated with suicide in a dose-dependent manner, with findings of a 7-fold increased risk in cancer patients and a 2-fold increased risk in patients treated for other medical conditions. The particularly strong association in individuals with cancer may be explained by high-dose treatment. Given the widespread use of glucocorticoids, our study deserves clinical and public health attention. Awareness of the association between new use of oral glucocorticoids and suicide may enhance prevention efforts for an extremely serious global public health problem.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,060
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,120

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations13
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWorld PsychiatryMême sujetAdrenal Hormones and DisordersTravaux en français237 207